Return-Path: X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9BB126DFB for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ng9FyeqrQD3N for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C725C1293E8 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y193so48784756lfd.3 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:54:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jdRHXHrOeSNXhcPhaIr0S5sENk35/V51IqBuLnnCtGA=; b=eH0JASTpeC9naTFt9OCVnonbXo+xgMn0PUDx5mkeJgslIPjpS4chb5I3Bd3LOdOp2y jhWA8P2T4m09bM+NyBk0z8FkeUOXk95e9cBE7TZAIx3mchpGSGCpc0P7x0MHKEB47OPt JpGAjFmX9+j5shf2iD8bR0cBbewG1b4Q3CYaSN9KW3UpiTsi09vnEVrpWFMamgv+kWsp YgFA5HHGS4I+crM4/GMGZRKRtjL4jtt74ORaLzpuYfHfiwnCRx6bIBGppBOrm7Nys6Dj GP50g0xk+whqdoXHYv5S0UdKXRzAetLxsZpppcW8/Zb2PKSY3m4sBIInboJcDwkZvxug 6brg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jdRHXHrOeSNXhcPhaIr0S5sENk35/V51IqBuLnnCtGA=; b=dfsX2Srgzl8Du9JhYWX6EPIHBawYEs/HNYei+LpEX0KtP7WzdcFTPXX8eVVVAt8/Kc Nbotc+gaX4iHWFpSJUyYhMPzh22v886LHvX2tOleVFBynT5WbtX4EvPyFtf4c/tkEhnq //z1KfZkK6wkFcbkkamXZEpXqH7LyyOuJdehwMiEXXYYtFzF9+3aDPfOSk5tH7jNDpLb b+YYBybyn3TnW7gmV1rwhb6VHL35YJkLKUJyVLQWNNgxoWVcGKcAr6Vx83aozSDVwNrt DINdCDseRG72cVAp54SyV4XRb/wT1Lavfl0kl6tpMl3bj8xKhh/+fDgienrxemfbXZbn tO8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3sLD3rgCjqk6Bm+mS9twOEjwusfbzMqBnlOJjzO4PHKB+7zI8yMa/IlBL3M40vYA== X-Received: by 10.46.69.193 with SMTP id s184mr4175659lja.12.1489956857106; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.126] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a16sm2658520lfk.24.2017.03.19.13.54.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Mar 2017 13:54:16 -0700 (PDT) To: Benjamin Kaduk References: <468011f3-258a-405e-c883-18739486661f@free.fr> <20170319194425.GD30306@kduck.kaduk.org> Cc: unbearable@ietf.org From: Leif Johansson Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:54:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170319194425.GD30306@kduck.kaduk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Unbearable] A storm in a cup of tea (related to draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol-13) X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:54:21 -0000 On 2017-03-19 20:44, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 08:32:05PM +0100, Leif Johansson wrote: >> >>> Hence, up to now, I consider that this comment has not been solved to my >>> satisfaction. >> >> I don't understand what, if any you want the chairs or the WG to do >> based on this email. > > I thought it was pretty clear that he wanted the new "client > collusion" section added to the document and content moved to it. > Thank you for helping to clarify that Ben. I encourage anyone who support this change to +1 Denis message. Cheers Leif