Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) support is global on google servers
John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Fri, 20 January 2017 13:01 UTC
Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B215129B41 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:01:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_jbGmNbRm0y for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 391F412947B for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v200so85363072ywc.3 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:01:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=lQcMSUrzytNP6U21hDgf86bBDRykcs/BH94snphF9IY=; b=EGfw0KNiw8DGlJ3WFjK7Dxt7LJgqmHZfs7WhwpG0ADOSoW2vCqfYSLGzdcf+D/hDwx V1iVl3ODeFZNwj0egKOYpT7sFtlcowz4zyrzfNmCppdq3JE8APYZv6v2aFT0RRordyZL DL7ABZwkqBWDNFP93cffDOXQLaZKjN7IhpJrxwrTEtaVHHbmQ5t5Sp196Nebc6t/haJJ CHFWv+AE+E60+b83/Uc17GXkAeuymHEEQKWsjGVGjCQDyr0OMNcHJYOSSV5+XdJwDLx9 Yiv7L+2JtfZbr5+V9fHpiiehElsPHJDtWLeurqSr1YWCIzms8MuT4YWpc8oXNDTb/Xb3 em2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=lQcMSUrzytNP6U21hDgf86bBDRykcs/BH94snphF9IY=; b=jYSDbnJJGhuzdE4KfZKInXyX4QEWFJ9NyBAoCd+1xrerLRF0lCmBwQY19Guw45Q7XX iDq5NSo/sKDDN0JWnH0TT2m5101GVBPb13LvElt3o7AN9jGcazZICP6FKH4t7VtzJhtM bcC8mZVI4fuSphR42+3XAwyX5ueukqryRoNY+ueuhRFjoG/US8tY0vFwRZhGKWBkXpmM u0SwkMAhT1e1uszuv4pcrkrTbAq8af3Rqca4V5JNgDMfs/4qABnJ1ieij9zwQnT5ioQq QFIutMXCKbjVtP8CQCfG0tNyMs9x9X2vUdiiDJYoLTk0/T8Ka9Y6c2cKp2qlp0lrNQ9C X/mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKyPStPjF7TsfHICm7ggPUVYH5tl47a5/Vp4oKqrAJGnwmx+pRppxMNiVsH1e5ujojx
X-Received: by 10.55.82.214 with SMTP id g205mr12966464qkb.78.1484917305160; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.86.130] ([191.115.66.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c41sm5877443qtd.3.2017.01.20.05.01.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:01:44 -0800 (PST)
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Message-Id: <8074E906-BC37-42BF-8DE3-C2C797D71577@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_15F82FB7-84D0-4F37-B58F-234DFA995BF0"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 10:01:30 -0300
In-Reply-To: <CAH9QtQHiMNKTWkExDduH=huCzs=yVW+E7YM3Wnoh0DoeYUe08A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@google.com>
References: <CAH9QtQHiMNKTWkExDduH=huCzs=yVW+E7YM3Wnoh0DoeYUe08A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/5KQwOeNd6mHehUMckc668a5Kkxo>
Cc: Tokbind WG <unbearable@ietf.org>, token-binding-team <token-binding-team@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) support is global on google servers
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:01:48 -0000
Great news. Is token binding not behind a feature flag for some of the newer builds of Chrome? We should check if it is on in the Edge preview rings. I think Andrei mentioned that was about to happen in Korea. Do you have any test page that would show if the cookies are successfully token bound ? Thanks John B. > On Jan 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@google.com> wrote: > > I'm seeing 5.7K token binding headers per second at the moment, about 5K/s sending both channel-ID and token binding (probably chrome), and about 700/s with just token binding (probably not chrome). > > Bill > _______________________________________________ > Unbearable mailing list > Unbearable@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable
- [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) suppor… Bill Cox
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… John Bradley
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Bill Cox
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… John Bradley
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Brian Campbell
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Andrei Popov
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… John Bradley
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Vinod Anupam
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… John Bradley
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Nick Harper
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Andrei Popov
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Pranav Kukreja
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Nick Harper
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Pranav Kukreja
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Hans Zandbelt
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Bill Cox
- Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) su… Bill Cox