IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) support is global on google servers

Bill Cox <waywardgeek@google.com> Fri, 20 January 2017 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <waywardgeek@google.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC72E129BA6 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kmaZgpQpNryU for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E539129B9E for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id r185so20717877ita.0 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=41r77h81ILR6QuPPVrwUyJWHBlHv0HIenekPOEXFDG8=; b=kR4E3VVHodIkcATYh2BHZX+zNbuVKly62b5g1kTS0gkuD+6RCt495pQhtnOEaLdw/f a8hTyfExRY5nXWAX+sfgXjq2oUQflrxCr4azCqjlA5+Vztd1xeSmV4hP7FefJXN6muo0 ENEROUldqY24i70zOX9tmi9RwJxFKbHDV0yHF1pD0igrI6nvBq33wwc3laU1okvdMJeo TSkzYey2WF457jJynVlfS9cn/2Fi6kgM/TCHe4j+N++cRzN0yI5Mec8/xXz3TxLHBHub 6y1AiNECgrqdcafu0voUb+etH8Zjxi/oYu0blmuQ7Wy8k88aI6Upr0+yWaBr07EVxGmR cLiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=41r77h81ILR6QuPPVrwUyJWHBlHv0HIenekPOEXFDG8=; b=Cm3P08NRvR8Xdrv8DW/SPAszUPmPp+aF4eIOg9hvrGbVlB41dhsQpNVNazRQXn8zJa azjlwLK05AINWeb1NTFBPcvn/s2bcorqVJYWNVe9R0uqyss4gnqOyKSSRQpa2/xRTNdd 72NX3wY5hEtqrCcSxgcoroFNWjJyG0enh6ECvj5mEnzmYBm9yPmh4LL1FyKjcmzqlTQJ d8tCHKHtax44QvjHB6hdu7BMxx+LvvbgnElQN7j+fSyWCekMyZV28XwM4VClT3Jlkctv lx0qMYLjkkq0z70Sm/YCVTDVdKENBByDAGLS18rVpk8yshTt1ykLIGHpeznbgZ0RulZG ggHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL8D5HUmZ0ZzJCWiyjpoOwILakQAl16zuln5wY8Jdm8OMQ5NVAhCAmQvrRBTe9rAUSgL+TmXXDxiId2KZns
X-Received: by 10.36.98.80 with SMTP id d77mr3115087itc.99.1484919328543; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.152.41 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8074E906-BC37-42BF-8DE3-C2C797D71577@ve7jtb.com>
References: <CAH9QtQHiMNKTWkExDduH=huCzs=yVW+E7YM3Wnoh0DoeYUe08A@mail.gmail.com> <8074E906-BC37-42BF-8DE3-C2C797D71577@ve7jtb.com>
From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:35:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH9QtQFegV+GzL1rRLZoFZ5Wy=6u=FL86AM3EuCrHH8p+PC+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f7af6198585054686b915"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/DJy4xyWs9iNHtDCYKt1tEvUVU-A>
Cc: Tokbind WG <unbearable@ietf.org>, token-binding-team <token-binding-team@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) support is global on google servers
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:35:31 -0000

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:01 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:

> Great news.
>
> Is token binding not behind a feature flag for some of the newer builds of
> Chrome?
>

It still is behind a feature flag.  Nick Harper is doing a launch to turn
token binding on by default, IIUC.


> We should check if it is on in the Edge preview rings.   I think Andrei
> mentioned that was about to happen in Korea.
>
> Do you have any test page that would show if the cookies are successfully
> token bound ?
>

I don't think we've built such a page yet.  Would it be useful?

Bill

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status