IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] Updated I-Ds

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Fri, 17 February 2017 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B52812944F for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:59:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56USTcs5ELit for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CFD7129559 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:53:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x49so29370080qtc.2 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:53:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=drFqvMN4ZaLBzlO8ue1xQhtHii7Aa0giHyIaLB3AqQM=; b=R+gnmQGo3HWBgElYt29XVAWa2Ihtn00ZhVffih4hlOA4B25VteBEOeZ8RkNRJLG+Kx +h2ANCbUtiKI3G9DnUZzOrQQevLFZsO6add6BScekYa3ElIy3FkgSgC5uUkIhWvIOlEw 2382n9hLO8498C9ToKoN4meXlkyUHF8pw5ZB/qtbvlRBoj87X00zJvre3V7loDSHsZhD FxZXNqm4g+nWG+5zeedY/J9/OUvMQ/ifAhX0oMsT8q+vlfL15Ef2r5+ZdWllkebLpsre 9Ze0iqb26z0beY3yjn9jCYIVhdRS/GhTL7s1ufjVqm8+gRSGWrgcx9FrBZp+TODk5Lqh n1Ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=drFqvMN4ZaLBzlO8ue1xQhtHii7Aa0giHyIaLB3AqQM=; b=mStU6FV07G6PMS6wrAvEyyWl8Few4Ueg094RrNQVV0i73fx+9O6hGsxIrfcSPhcqXv GQH7uRHK5c8CyWYybsAG8iKw6pcYOCwib7vAbES2lsrH+pz5hTbVUdN9CGLEY3jt8m9H djGevdjRjZcDmNAbPVGXDhzdtPvZ16TuanJb/LWp9MLV3PcH3+Of6c+iGMhm4wtqHpck 93EI4reNNK5b+5rdeYWtjZhmJNnsiLpnsJOM0FaaGWBUsPy0hbA6FJ1x2SUBSAbgC6nh 0yRSt3eZcBEa6x/Tk1jkHOYV3Qio0eksrncmXcNdFvFeiGYD0f1szTbKE/y8sejAdFqx 6NSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nN8Fr+N0ivQmrTZxohu2ojei0nD9RnKrjDoSOkvKc+bsDhxTjGlzeQ41Rn0N6laIdx
X-Received: by 10.237.47.230 with SMTP id m93mr4730910qtd.103.1487292802189; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:53:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.8.100] ([181.201.178.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m143sm5487985qke.18.2017.02.16.16.53.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:53:21 -0800 (PST)
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Message-Id: <49D963D1-FCF8-4A71-B362-16C8EA6B3F50@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5AB73A5E-857B-4A5B-8E9B-37290083AF85"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:53:18 -0300
In-Reply-To: <f635ae12-5101-c177-1b10-79b291e37e8c@sunet.se>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
References: <CY1PR0301MB08426E0DA41282E1CD733F958C5A0@CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <2A56853E-C785-48CF-A75E-5F61683B1035@ve7jtb.com> <dbd6cfbd-b64e-2d67-b71e-67eaf78ea25c@free.fr> <CY1PR0301MB084292E37631494FC866DC7C8C5A0@CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <E2EB25C7-7B6A-47A2-91AE-BF1FC06A8639@ve7jtb.com> <CACdeXi+06wt_L5X0xNVNTVAb5Rics2yT_LCoa_nJRRMB7DSPCA@mail.gmail.com> <f635ae12-5101-c177-1b10-79b291e37e8c@sunet.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/FmMsczPyfeROq45n5dRANXb-wEE>
Cc: unbearable@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Updated I-Ds
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:59:42 -0000

I just looked at diff of Andrei’s proposed addition to security considerations, and it is fine.

Lets rev protocol to 13 and go with that.

> On Feb 16, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> wrote:
> 
> On 2017-02-16 22:50, Nick Harper wrote:
>> I think that we don't need to do any more than add a sentence to 7.1 of
>> TBPROTO saying something along the lines of "the Token Binding protocol
>> does not prevent cooperating clients from sharing a bound token" (i.e.
>> what Andrei said). I'm also fine if we don't add anything.
> 
> I sense consensus forming around adding a sentence in the security
> considerations section.
> 
> I propose to start another WGLC right now and deal with this issue
> as part of the WGLC comments.
> 
> 	Cheers Leif
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unbearable mailing list
> Unbearable@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status