Re: [Unbearable] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: (with COMMENT)

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:07 PM Andrei Popov <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Warren,
>
> Thanks for the review. Will make the change suggested by Will Liu in the
> next revision.
>
> TLS 1.3 is sufficiently different that the TB WG decided to specify the
> use of TB with TLS 1.3 in a separate document.
>
> Cheers,
>

​Okey doeky, WFM.
W​



>
> Andrei
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 8:05 AM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; John Bradley <
> [e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Warren Kumari's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: (with COMMENT)
>
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-criteria.html&data=02%7C01%7CAndrei.Popov%40microsoft.com%7Cef4f94d5157a4ae1bae408d5b5be3b3c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C1%7C636614751011830665&sdata=5wBkGrbBbh7jpzoGH3KYtPuE6CN4ls4klh4HkT1Xy7E%3D&reserved=0
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation%2F&data=02%7C01%7CAndrei.Popov%40microsoft.com%7Cef4f94d5157a4ae1bae408d5b5be3b3c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C1%7C636614751011830665&sdata=RGE3aQGPO7BxwbQo4bZ0l8utz3zDE%2Fm%2F8lVXd7tqMQA%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please also see Will LIU's OpsDir review here:
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Freview-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-10-opsdir-lc-liu-2017-12-04%2F&data=02%7C01%7CAndrei.Popov%40microsoft.com%7Cef4f94d5157a4ae1bae408d5b5be3b3c%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C1%7C636614751011830665&sdata=mZ70PwPXXG78PxCvhtKN0XxvGnNIwZA98waxfxr44po%3D&reserved=0
> It suggests a simple change which will remove confusion/ambiguity.
>
> The document says (in the Introduction):
> "The negotiation of the Token Binding protocol and key parameters in
> combination with TLS 1.3 and later versions is beyond the scope of this
> document."
>
> How hard would it be to make it work with TLS 1.3? Actually, what part of
> it doesn't already? (I'm guessing I'm missing something super-obvious)...
>
>
>

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf