[Unbearable] Token Binding Demo Online
Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Fri, 24 March 2017 21:12 UTC
Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AFD1286B2 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pingidentity.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vpH9JLen3dOt for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 112FB1294FB for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o126so805784pfb.3 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pingidentity.com; s=gmail; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4gqRWGYV3lqcjewl4wn1dfkTcvYB7PpwJgDWIKpo5J4=; b=pZuAPsVXcSU54wl2wav4wdM5J+X5OeIHHR+qgFGAK9Czyigv1/wPKozES1xD3ubDdA FhkGyYYaF4U/oq8z8jqrDwYNArlO2yF9KNVo+2eHObG2N0CKIerxZ3aO2C/Ezuj/TeTL +kzfF+7fISeT8KGza7sG7Z1IG3gA7SIIj+rxg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4gqRWGYV3lqcjewl4wn1dfkTcvYB7PpwJgDWIKpo5J4=; b=lI61EEf6fuwsR5qY48I7QPgkTyCSTWun2/TZtMUxjzWa8clNcmiY/SnPuG9PPL8ww6 9CXsQtqL+82vF9LKZ2YYC5LsrHdtey9N0sQqX5ksDrcA3R75bWvJ6raerl2GXEarGfcs BVYNKW+g0C64Dqwf6toztXuu8xvxIeIUBjQBrVznsIcg1MKmH3pkNzYATLcsZ++0TssY 5m2yKJNNADcNXWNN7ibV0sfK2z+Dpl6FIeMVAh3Rf1LcaMeY64QT9/0TrXJDBc4aXnxj +PbN92EsaiqXgbR8TG6yBsV/GKrfWtfXkX/PAwTsbMQrmRr53AdoOwxbnD45nelxojiR fDZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0j8iKQiMMeFpWOENYibEP7bYS30o7r6amZCWQYZVb2FT/EcDMx+KPYUBBZ3VbLv20iNrsO1zwwmRUqJyAB
X-Received: by 10.98.159.82 with SMTP id g79mr11720419pfe.189.1490389925290; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.170.138 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:11:34 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCQrSH3AXOvzH56qo-N9MgPFA37vGZ9EQzLGvagTE=cgKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF Tokbind WG <unbearable@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0a542e13079f054b8072b2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/Om-hUZWUR6HqKW733jOoYTAYeog>
Subject: [Unbearable] Token Binding Demo Online
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:12:08 -0000
I put up a demonstration of some token binding functionality that I wanted to share. There are a few parts to it, which I'll attempt to describe below. At https://unbearable-bc.ping-eng.com:3000/open/ is a token binding capable reverse proxy (of sorts) that is proxying requests to http://httpbin.org/ with a little path rewriting. If you go to https://unbearable-bc.ping-eng.com:3000/open/headers with a token binding (-10 to -13) capable browser, for example, you should see the a dump of the request headers including "Sec-Token-Binding". The reverse proxy is also set up with some access control and will proxy from https://unbearable-bc.ping-eng.com:3000/ to http://httpbin.org/ but require an authenticated session to do so. And it's using OpenID Connect Token Bound Authentication <http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-token-bound-authentication-1_0.html> with an IDP at https://token-provider-bc.ping-eng.com:9031 to authenticate users. So, for example, if you go to https://unbearable-bc.ping-eng.com:3000/headers without a session you will be redirected to the authorization endpoint at that IDP and presented with a login page. Use USERNAME: brian and PASSWORD: Test5555 on that page. After login, you'll be sent back to the relying party via the Form Post Response Mode <https://openid.net/specs/oauth-v2-form-post-response-mode-1_0.html> where the ID Token is sent though the browser. If you grab that token and decode it, there should be a confirmation method claim that has the hash of the Token Binding ID used with the relying party (i.e. "cnf": {"tbh": "...hash..."}). The relying party sets up its own session from the OIDC SSO, which is a cookie named PA.unbearable that is a JWT. The page at https://unbearable-bc.ping-eng.com:3000/headers will dump the headers including that cookie. If you decode that JWT, you should also see that the local session is token bound with the confirmation method claim. Things will still work when using a non token binding capable browser but none of the tokens will be token bound. As a reminder, you can enable Token Binding in Chrome by putting chrome://flags/#enable-token-binding into the address bar. Chrome and Chrome Canaryā€ˇ are what I've been using to play with this. I'm hopping someone with the TB enabled Edge/IE can poke around on this demo too.
- [Unbearable] Token Binding Demo Online Brian Campbell
- Re: [Unbearable] Token Binding Demo Online =JeffH
- Re: [Unbearable] Token Binding Demo Online Brian Campbell