IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tokbind-https-14: (with COMMENT)

Nick Harper <nharper@google.com> Tue, 05 June 2018 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <nharper@google.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B012131145 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xL6xWtf8bCMQ for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C48B131187 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t6-v6so4642535iob.10 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=APAvRFTt5sxnsXSZBitWmRZYiPA//jprzvVzjF3Pu5M=; b=rfifbaGI/Iz152gWGetuZR3Uj7/EFV9oiqxDrrR+MoXApuDj/0Za7O7grjBVnWTyjV IvoktfSnksV/RJi58s/8i0wQM2oMcqJJvwTscJaoZwd3Fi+Wy3VfyDC81fWCNTfaVExw pYDUQGiZnkRoCWhXt4S4sF5Wx2YvdCZRExKibr4BIrkbgvm0LcQJP6JUyWgbLNtl9BwZ x3TXyRGg+gMwZPxIYM0ieBYhbkPY5/jJVxxT2EluGIVjeHyHe2OQLyffn8FKXamQHthS Gk11E7RBuvrQJFJDa0zT3PP6Sa2aRfwDfkCmgdax2Tzw4ui7t5HUJksPyg7VvKGV8Xtn GmvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=APAvRFTt5sxnsXSZBitWmRZYiPA//jprzvVzjF3Pu5M=; b=Y28ZxdphVFz1Fc0IBhfS+C0cU5rO9z7HMxm4Y5c6b48pyieE5/v0ZxxLSL4a4lkKyE m6xMSqbVEyh9iVtCsIxuTi8/TkVaXpshbvrWXj7gVRsb3wxKq3ll+MrxqC9NAm4A6hp6 6ptNBnBQcvqPv+hc/XZ59l3WeHcVTCwcPZjmdxpWjdnZVzPBSNifDPrrrNz895tI3bLv /BjLnsZUofgFlKi8XjXqfvbvkeLrhCRJ/CnTOge9Vt9v46XQ+KCruD7YLwwQGrA72Vjw uJabXT5WeHDwoVU27485rOgMir98CBaXb5QAW+XmwdbTaLLcPNNGe9+1wDvaIbAuOu+p 3AEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1esSCQ2poTnnkfpn3upeS9+2GQM8eSf5i5oRD+PFiXk8Vnqce+ z5YH/iJVxsc+xbbNg0P2F+XOAnja6mEssW/W5h3uDQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIT2dHRGRK3tijEYAvSeclMjtjcCrrKnrhsbz26Xt1MOmfV+L/Gl/arzwtbs9h4MbPQQOHl7EFeMn2sY0AUElU=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3110:: with SMTP id j16-v6mr26762401ioa.249.1528225303125; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:e0a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b9cc789a-6b18-38d1-e693-479071c70f16@nostrum.com>
References: <152575956787.20253.13180458622500226833.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADHfa2DPni78gNNZyQr6Tbt6DTzVWY+md7L4220NPTDprUCp6A@mail.gmail.com> <c103c5d7-3508-23b5-aae0-165dcd81db17@nostrum.com> <CACdeXiKnuLxR5ZVn9D9p9CHk+SBqFMOJGeziKjVNAw9AifvmMQ@mail.gmail.com> <b9cc789a-6b18-38d1-e693-479071c70f16@nostrum.com>
From: Nick Harper <nharper@google.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:01:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CACdeXiLuNdafwooaADVqdk4xZQqG9GPjtM528JZR-Tfb3+TJ4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, Tokbind WG <unbearable@ietf.org>, tokbind-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tokbind-https@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000550e23056de9ae77"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/QdzxjRXvt0cYtUXnPWIvvvB-IyA>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tokbind-https-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 19:01:56 -0000

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Then please add an informative reference to draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13.
>
> /a
>
The reason for splitting off draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13 into a separate draft
was so that publication of draft-ietf-tls-tls13 doesn't delay publication
of the 3 core tokbind drafts (draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol,
draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation, and draft-ietf-tokbind-https). It sounds
like adding a reference to draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13 would result in
postponing publication of at least this draft until both
draft-ietf-tls-tls13 and draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13 get published.

Given that the WG's goal of excluding TLS 1.3 in the 3 core drafts is to
avoid blocking them on publication of draft-ietf-tls-tls13, what do you
think the best approach is with this?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email