[Unbearable] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: (with COMMENT)

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Please also see Will LIU's OpsDir review here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-10-opsdir-lc-liu-2017-12-04/
It suggests a simple change which will remove confusion/ambiguity.

The document says (in the Introduction):
"The negotiation of the Token Binding protocol and key parameters in
combination with TLS 1.3 and later versions is beyond the scope of this
document."

How hard would it be to make it work with TLS 1.3? Actually, what part of it
doesn't already? (I'm guessing I'm missing something super-obvious)...