IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) support is global on google servers

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Fri, 20 January 2017 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9491294C3 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:45:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id anIZudG3l_i1 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x234.google.com (mail-yw0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9367129BA9 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x234.google.com with SMTP id w75so87068831ywg.1 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:45:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=6GM9ysUhgvqZX9Y/LKBqVtoifGmTWjJwHHXI0b7ZjlY=; b=jBYqL/kv9xwwKqxRXGVr7DbpdiiKTbsFmpRrRHdCBbGtYNgfO7YsORW+7idhsmp+DH GcuJm7+h1KLu8tF3hbnYh3h2myX230Yq6L+4Nlc9k8UbVmZgIKBCMQOQKZ8ffqcUDLWy gFKIBhvV0F0qncypnREPUP48KldBG7e2Z8unRBcVhR3W3lnVHLjZ3zhMS4YFyoHkgtO6 HJ1hP555Nvjs4dBr65nlKznVC8rgYOfUxJYGjBEzPXf0MKP6dJYrpzYZEDCbFBPc7x6h qVzTpwMCoEJk8qnmgWi19Uf5Ih2yEnDtxJTuqdLAgOioU/hwH7dwUnFyfTpgTNNc6V4A onSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=6GM9ysUhgvqZX9Y/LKBqVtoifGmTWjJwHHXI0b7ZjlY=; b=afuDkthfhRmzR2a6cYyKvUzzJ+3dxTkS8Yh56YYRjIz0VGrwDCj2of1ON5GlgoDPj2 15kdwTStVPApLSzlJ8wR5AOp4/xfIl7ED4ZGpGA2jUddwg6zfk0iLFt21W722Iz8DMWj mXcGnoge7hTQPm41dkGqMCIkOA9OXsbTqIDjRuUdwma1kSR0eP9Je6Dgo9oSEFZhHm8m 9NZyhNaa4Qju2IKYkMOxA2L+cXop/MKZkHV2sLkmVUMJ3t9M+CrQlRFDR7JjcXx9fbuO EB5i3RRZYF4Il+jAYtyC522NzKZkpxdU1pm94LeCGxeIPc+QYfsXfa1sDPtWEpywaOtF zC7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKRO5M6bFIR1mVwPCq1DSwOBW0ShQQEmWA/dqMRny11CHqqht59GePneC/o1DsG9so6
X-Received: by 10.55.139.5 with SMTP id n5mr11790028qkd.225.1484919923861; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.86.130] ([191.115.66.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm5939419qkx.49.2017.01.20.05.45.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:45:23 -0800 (PST)
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Message-Id: <ED317261-FDFB-4325-B316-B793F61DCCAE@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0BDB4D97-B875-4C44-90EA-C514F9511896"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 10:45:19 -0300
In-Reply-To: <CAH9QtQFegV+GzL1rRLZoFZ5Wy=6u=FL86AM3EuCrHH8p+PC+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bill Cox <waywardgeek@google.com>
References: <CAH9QtQHiMNKTWkExDduH=huCzs=yVW+E7YM3Wnoh0DoeYUe08A@mail.gmail.com> <8074E906-BC37-42BF-8DE3-C2C797D71577@ve7jtb.com> <CAH9QtQFegV+GzL1rRLZoFZ5Wy=6u=FL86AM3EuCrHH8p+PC+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/UA7Lf41xrkcDIJmXb6iML_Bp0YM>
Cc: Tokbind WG <unbearable@ietf.org>, token-binding-team <token-binding-team@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Token binding version (0, 10) support is global on google servers
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:45:27 -0000

Can you remind people in the WG what the flag is.

I think a test page is useful for PR.

The browserauth.net page run my Dirk should be updated to point to it.

I know that there is a test in the Chromium source but having some public page will encourage testing.

Thanks 
John B.

> On Jan 20, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Bill Cox <waywardgeek@google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:01 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com <mailto:ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>> wrote:
> Great news.
> 
> Is token binding not behind a feature flag for some of the newer builds of Chrome?
> 
> It still is behind a feature flag.  Nick Harper is doing a launch to turn token binding on by default, IIUC.
>  
> We should check if it is on in the Edge preview rings.   I think Andrei mentioned that was about to happen in Korea.
> 
> Do you have any test page that would show if the cookies are successfully token bound ?
> 
> I don't think we've built such a page yet.  Would it be useful?
> 
> Bill

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status