[Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: (with COMMENT)
Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Thu, 10 May 2018 14:30 UTC
Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietf.org
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD05212EAEC;
Thu, 10 May 2018 07:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation@ietf.org, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>,
tokbind-chairs@ietf.org, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, unbearable@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152596261976.10484.5075010847906425997.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 07:30:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/VcJSl9HlP9v-iDLlUEez06pUZuE>
Subject: [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on
draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than
bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies,
OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG
focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\""
<unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>,
<mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>,
<mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 14:30:20 -0000
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- struct { uint8 major; uint8 minor; } TB_ProtocolVersion; I think naming them "major" and "minor" is misleading, because it doesn't actually mean anything. Lack of description of how versionning is to be used makes me sad, but I understand that this was discussed in the WG.
- [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on dr… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection o… Andrei Popov
- Re: [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection o… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection o… Andrei Popov