[Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Thu, 10 May 2018 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietf.org
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD05212EAEC; Thu, 10 May 2018 07:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation@ietf.org, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, tokbind-chairs@ietf.org, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, unbearable@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152596261976.10484.5075010847906425997.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 07:30:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/VcJSl9HlP9v-iDLlUEez06pUZuE>
Subject: [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 14:30:20 -0000

Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

   struct {
       uint8 major;
       uint8 minor;
   } TB_ProtocolVersion;

I think naming them "major" and "minor" is misleading, because it doesn't
actually mean anything.

Lack of description of how versionning is to be used makes me sad, but I
understand that this was discussed in the WG.