[Unbearable] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 08 May 2018 20:42 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietf.org
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D6C12EAC0; Tue, 8 May 2018 13:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation@ietf.org, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, tokbind-chairs@ietf.org, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, unbearable@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152581216695.16169.3799820289089367649.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 13:42:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/YVjTXt4OUdZgEj-7s-wOfokMP80>
Subject: [Unbearable] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 20:42:47 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Addendum: the ARTART review raises a point that I believe should be fixed or clarified in the document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12-artart-telechat-miller-2018-05-08/ Original Comments: I would really like to see a non-normative mention of draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13 in here, to let readers know that a TLS 1.3 solution is in progress rather than merely being excluded from scope. I also think the Abstract is incomplete without mentioning the limitation of this document's mechanism to TLS 1.2 and lower.