IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] Updated I-Ds

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Fri, 17 February 2017 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6C6129586 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:53:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sunet-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYJy-xWig6sw for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 309D11294D2 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z127so17869429lfa.2 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:53:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sunet-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DDXICw7lAYdH4NTHtQBIljoLGrGSqMAOvxu5APuuO/Q=; b=RZIJBMMHOrjODYornis7KuX+67eV4jWHzA8KleDFqdPIRmd3kecRBbjM5XsLsLF9bI GbWsvuAoBVWyXXwhxbhHaJlzv/+mSwJCSjOmjUpBuGYQTtYlhQ9pWbjs2xunDBqhRQjW GaWnTOMF/aLsKw3taab10LOky9/WUMiR+ci4DGDyy7/9c/TDLJ4r41NObC7PAhoewTLh GU5t2l1P3dwxc1O2wQ47hQkkANY8EbZCvFrPIwVviAMPMZ1XRwZ2j0ANUnvblFyQiWDn iGkD5TFPpu9HYOd2MzGyuUKjG/A+Xl0CdEtdinj/g9Vt1Y3foDuv0BSaAeOQQedXk1Gc Ogag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DDXICw7lAYdH4NTHtQBIljoLGrGSqMAOvxu5APuuO/Q=; b=Z+hR8m1wEi6b0xsTdaZodP3dZUHssKdubDw50TJYEqRDnzWoKeLv7x6/w6l69lPNu0 ADwhlLlIufp/Z87+GOVbdAm+kUQKWse5m4EV4eS2wAfAS4DLN09k+cCQ9cNlOpVcrITO qFPgnOe5B64eAO/BnYQFDGyeN3f3iiz9Wr0X9SrbSFPsKe819vP93X0gXZwQJvm6qiLn 0LWbrKKjY4MkVOSHZT/nwRJs9RwCdKpA5Lj6Q9MekiEDZ8B7zbtsp6b8KwLjz0gTV6Da fuDsU4uykhv/43lBTNABCHfaCNovDN3a8l/uqJAWHLVnMnk9P/RPUPsW/TgUx+px02zz u0Jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lfbzGEr+eU/ZubgdTHivR5W2AcCQ9UgjjNIcxPgDc8Bu2+CowF8NIuXtSknOqtMA==
X-Received: by 10.25.22.201 with SMTP id 70mr1800385lfw.97.1487310835304; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.110] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 26sm2141791ljo.21.2017.02.16.21.53.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14D27)
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0301MB08426A0C1E992383D06144388C5D0@CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 06:53:54 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <95C79323-0477-4485-9330-732F02B37B3F@sunet.se>
References: <CY1PR0301MB08426E0DA41282E1CD733F958C5A0@CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <2A56853E-C785-48CF-A75E-5F61683B1035@ve7jtb.com> <dbd6cfbd-b64e-2d67-b71e-67eaf78ea25c@free.fr> <CY1PR0301MB084292E37631494FC866DC7C8C5A0@CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <E2EB25C7-7B6A-47A2-91AE-BF1FC06A8639@ve7jtb.com> <CACdeXi+06wt_L5X0xNVNTVAb5Rics2yT_LCoa_nJRRMB7DSPCA@mail.gmail.com> <f635ae12-5101-c177-1b10-79b291e37e8c@sunet.se> <49D963D1-FCF8-4A71-B362-16C8EA6B3F50@ve7jtb.com> <CY1PR0301MB08426A0C1E992383D06144388C5D0@CY1PR0301MB0842.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/_OR67xn9nUyZGtncMU9fRkZ3rTQ>
Cc: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, "unbearable@ietf.org" <unbearable@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Updated I-Ds
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 05:53:59 -0000

I guess our messaged collided in mid air but the result is the same I guess

Skickat från min iPhone

> 17 feb. 2017 kl. 02:19 skrev Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>:
> 
> Uploaded TBPROTO-13 with added language concerning cooperating clients (see section 7.1):
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol-13
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Andrei
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Unbearable [mailto:unbearable-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Bradley
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:53 PM
> To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
> Cc: unbearable@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Updated I-Ds
> 
> I just looked at diff of Andrei’s proposed addition to security considerations, and it is fine.
> 
> Lets rev protocol to 13 and go with that.
> 
>> On Feb 16, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2017-02-16 22:50, Nick Harper wrote:
>>> I think that we don't need to do any more than add a sentence to 7.1 
>>> of TBPROTO saying something along the lines of "the Token Binding 
>>> protocol does not prevent cooperating clients from sharing a bound token" (i.e.
>>> what Andrei said). I'm also fine if we don't add anything.
>> 
>> I sense consensus forming around adding a sentence in the security 
>> considerations section.
>> 
>> I propose to start another WGLC right now and deal with this issue as 
>> part of the WGLC comments.
>> 
>>    Cheers Leif
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unbearable mailing list
>> Unbearable@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status