Re: [Unbearable] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: (with COMMENT)

It's pretty easy to make it work with TLS 1.3:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13/ is a short draft
that explains how. The reason for the split was because of document timing,
specifically not wanting to hold up the Token Binding drafts on publication
of TLS 1.3.

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:04 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please also see Will LIU's OpsDir review here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-tokbind-
> negotiation-10-opsdir-lc-liu-2017-12-04/
> It suggests a simple change which will remove confusion/ambiguity.
>
> The document says (in the Introduction):
> "The negotiation of the Token Binding protocol and key parameters in
> combination with TLS 1.3 and later versions is beyond the scope of this
> document."
>
> How hard would it be to make it work with TLS 1.3? Actually, what part of
> it
> doesn't already? (I'm guessing I'm missing something super-obvious)...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unbearable mailing list
> Unbearable@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable
>