IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Unbearable] WGLC 3 on core documents

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Mon, 27 February 2017 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108F112A327 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sunet-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MbtuQaXUFd-p for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0E412A31A for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k202so24864722lfe.1 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sunet-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpzBDS/+mkNHaYZSAqW0TSTemRRAnYV6woJghg3jn+Q=; b=E829z/O9rJ4BMZ5uGcrHBbt+vhp8Vh+liGhJrfctxdlj0VGZFcTaiKPy82Jh2HSICu YyijbkzZdo34XFXEbOXpTdEDA0gHAQoc7qi0lVXxI4o9/ywTqhzbtzMzNhvY0Svc5kU0 hvASXsVqv5j/1ixpqmh46kWdUfdN+jOkoYZyu434Xz7QGGmX3eGCG+E9vROZ7kGmCfw4 33OHHyaSPP3Q1yL6GooRj7BU8eOsp0016OsrRn8+DD781zxPUcyZFddPPDrxCM5CkuNc Ax1YJwxvaAYdsZ6XCzcNQcV2GLOXLg+8ybMSinD6JrwpSrJ75UYeqBTDtxGthuDjN1/M clXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpzBDS/+mkNHaYZSAqW0TSTemRRAnYV6woJghg3jn+Q=; b=csOI/815+E7ez+s66tlXtO6S8a8x5vxab72mye9QTe+khUNcG86W/B1hUvL+jE+Txz I/aCCUiAoTudxXAp6FMis3tb18lRfUeMz9zJQ6s0GlZ/UK7eNYV/ubmYObKrnZy9D6tW DlWAQ+0L2iJnNyVLYSA6RMC3+IonSMyFb50REGC9e32NfUJxjnhgIOwmrdA2S1gZ0NIH PAE/8weRNIMK0lE3iTctbfBwnPXil2ZFfSB7ST2JqYF5xP89s3qc+H+beF70KJUAhQRb c3LN3Vw/ZmN5weikKtAgixT1khbIQwB1VApMS7bdaRd9Blw+mohqfwz279Q9Mp11b4df eu8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nGTVOeF3/T43nOOSSYDitWNubOqDisPEGwY/xnFrkgwduztj5uSuyqg3M4pOYpRQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.233.21 with SMTP id g21mr5940046lfh.130.1488228958147; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.149] (tb62-102-145-131.cust.teknikbyran.com. [62.102.145.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p19sm4139401lfe.1.2017.02.27.12.55.57 for <unbearable@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:57 -0800 (PST)
To: unbearable@ietf.org
References: <90198679-4549-2893-6d91-f4415df217ad@sunet.se> <705b00ac-d7dc-6d9d-9c5f-e895f22f300d@free.fr> <CACdeXi+8jrQkSi3iXNE1cu0JMSHc5Kyakc5YXABkuogUijywqg@mail.gmail.com> <59f884f8-02a9-1076-6479-87415bfdd8e0@free.fr>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Message-ID: <14098295-c9bc-c936-f920-3422f205cbbd@sunet.se>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:55:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59f884f8-02a9-1076-6479-87415bfdd8e0@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/m7c71qjaEwwcZfXle1vIMdkllu8>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] WGLC 3 on core documents
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:56:02 -0000

On 2017-02-27 21:39, Denis wrote:
> Nick,
> 
> For being able to speak of a "replay", there should first be a "play of
> the token".
> But in this case, there is a single"play" of it, and hence no replay.

This seems to be drifting into the esoteric.

Denis, right now I don't see consensus for the proposed change.

Anyone who feels there is merit to Denis proposal should provide
their explicit "+1" to it asap.

	Cheers Leif

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status