Re: [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 11 May 2018 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C137F124234; Thu, 10 May 2018 17:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dL9lt3MbMt_W; Thu, 10 May 2018 17:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22c.google.com (mail-yb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE2412D7EC; Thu, 10 May 2018 17:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id i13-v6so1297562ybl.4; Thu, 10 May 2018 17:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yg+SozmGG97kuI1xa/It7yZ4YPdLlx1H/8sqHccHOVU=; b=OX9lTxMvdhz1zIOkjiYxraH5Zxz07yMG+fR3zQw2j4GK5HhZGC45GC8awVEF7JxWt6 K8SCqwgPJ9G/2o8FMUDEsDj56HHR0G2Dh7NdsxkUeSQkqXJwQJl6h+0CRlwyMvYd7eEo MENrpdcKzebaOHCGFGlQgiN53hcVVStOySiSvo71zE16QcPjN5R29zwfU23TINpRxF3D v8rl42n4avrobtE6WYr8nZRIPvNfXvOrY/d4P+epS6OY04ua0a2RGoAnmXDeOvid8gae oXXXxtjep/zqR6j5TLJfTWXtzhCHCMuXJm2VuB2J8LJkqhibQEOTKYvh/+5JedgLWUFk A1KA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yg+SozmGG97kuI1xa/It7yZ4YPdLlx1H/8sqHccHOVU=; b=SD/Dy9Lh7LeGjXFZqo2zQlCoanGVAWiFayKaj2MpO8UH+27dC3heGuj4W+KxjVSOK1 kbQD2yVttW9GdLx9fns6ZS1F3SF+UMomr6ejCTQnTD9/vRmUK2yT78PIBRtJFiwAriza cNs5LK7evp/YHfWD90KwwkC6EV2/WuAn3ATqn/ieGPsOpdxJ0v+1hvMfNmopmbcNM5dr h081fQFm/TMazwDhkn3esuO5z39KwPeURAdameRlzmaTbO2uLglhb3F9dS1K2q4/qsfm mM1Sz5IRxpaT/TZB7Bvz1VGwwgPMt012RR/0Y9SBEvUff8/HXzWvGZ/aMKz3EmKqutF0 m0Ew==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweWKsG8V3UCCEX3ulADEmSg7cJAt+uOxoUMsJY1xRo3f8fUIiEh 7TWCHnvwJBkboVRms8RRAwFW86mk2jBWkTrNdNk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpz9M/W4smJOB/48IYTj8AtR+6uE8C3MB/zcYkmZQ6ddh3RUsXpR67nWTvPdYWhSFn5ZQAqOEnhVwGfjKKMPdg=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4d57:: with SMTP id a84-v6mr117251ybb.286.1526000189329; Thu, 10 May 2018 17:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a25:d014:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2018 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR21MB050744CFEEFE4D0DB9E77EF78C980@DM5PR21MB0507.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <152596261976.10484.5075010847906425997.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM5PR21MB050744CFEEFE4D0DB9E77EF78C980@DM5PR21MB0507.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 19:56:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-dmTH05oVSHXegiOxMcohF-ZYYReHe3XKK7hLj_vSHA+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com" <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, "draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation@ietf.org>, "unbearable@ietf.org" <unbearable@ietf.org>, "tokbind-chairs@ietf.org" <tokbind-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000036582f056be39bf3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/ndu3gHcjwETRC7_Sms5H37PU9Sk>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 00:56:33 -0000

Hi, Andrei,

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> In the next revision, I will add text to explicitly say that "major" and
> "minor" are for human convenience only and carry no protocol significance.
>

So this is only used to tell humans how big a change is, in relative terms?

That works for me (and I had chimed in about major/minor versions during
IESG evaluation, so thank you).

Spencer

Thanks,
>
> Andrei
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 7:30 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation@ietf.org; John Bradley <
> ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>gt;; tokbind-chairs@ietf.org; ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com;
> unbearable@ietf.org
> Subject: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13:
> (with COMMENT)
>
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-13: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fiesg%2Fstatement%2Fdiscuss-
> criteria.html&data=02%7C01%7CAndrei.Popov%40microsoft.com%
> 7C5d8b9eb9ce2c426f27a708d5b6828f46%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011
> db47%7C1%7C0%7C636615594220695716&sdata=E467o6WxQHxlvE2GxubCyHC7SyuGFh
> W7T9ET4YrI4hQ%3D&reserved=0
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-
> tokbind-negotiation%2F&data=02%7C01%7CAndrei.Popov%40microsoft.com%
> 7C5d8b9eb9ce2c426f27a708d5b6828f46%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011
> db47%7C1%7C0%7C636615594220695716&sdata=6O%2BlA0ToaiGEjQdqAR1nEOt7nEFo1Rb
> XMjLinFFpx5k%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    struct {
>        uint8 major;
>        uint8 minor;
>    } TB_ProtocolVersion;
>
> I think naming them "major" and "minor" is misleading, because it doesn't
> actually mean anything.
>
> Lack of description of how versionning is to be used makes me sad, but I
> understand that this was discussed in the WG.
>
>
>