Re: [Unbearable] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-11: (with COMMENT)

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Mon, 30 April 2018 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD92E127599 for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rT8tiHDQA8Rh for <unbearable@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B798127342 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c2-v6so12871733qtn.9 for <unbearable@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=amAirtVxWTCoSqJUvezonCDJG51HWTatTFZ2nvZ637k=; b=jwclzXuYz+iCFIWvcqnEZ+RStvxvIDzz4Zp33OJgF4RE5eVjyQkL4BxqRXR4ltUTU8 zDfrhnZY4P3LBmOWN17T1Qk42yFYn7xRds7zApetk0vih6ukFivWNaxdpex5v5BlnTJ1 N8s6PwNA2bKm+Fa6vhuj0OqxzqD9RXLJqbAUT/kw/7EEFRNTLxFXgsq43r9cPAn/g6j/ lUfZsbMg6BZZ//YeBkC8mVwpVCbqYDWFr3sMsztlChRpoonnnOFgRGd7TolCV7sAWztg oZOlX3HHqCwuvURCs4El85vtP2eRBoudc+93/JzhXaMfO/a9Sg1jfpI01MEq6bboWY1B H6fA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=amAirtVxWTCoSqJUvezonCDJG51HWTatTFZ2nvZ637k=; b=hnbzmLL+/Tr+NM5/g9YJMyf1hOG++wxhEC50RwSpqa2CSPG9EK2fDJKvGDE1AAAHEQ N3oVEYAbLaGelpBXpTJEluWo2jME8vyRKH7KZvaWOUuuDvOvNwecAGtSc5MYNJTFxzC+ YEI67PBUQwPVZSOaw4T2cwfpsL6gdejY97dX0Gr55J4fh9Ag0ptm/oRtqZteogibqtZV PBJPgHZHdTd6lCBmveQPFFrYh3DmnaU20WTrsZrG2BPo9gVxKIMFyjYk7fXXHIes7+Pz CmAZdSOtiNzwhi2qraiDwasOgDGH2lc9gHBcLj4hr8gEE9hLJRzhjN2sUFP3gvQkZvBJ au0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCxuqfKnrQR7emCTwJAtNErjj4ZayX6wQWobksJQH9Zh9uomU6Q bRW4t2ZtRJVe1fsi1YFHss9qUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZq8WpDNNRRcSw1tFX0v+u7yhiwtUWxKRghKb6xp50hNeWZe5m98Q6mLhXlL7xhODpR7qpmRLA==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:35e5:: with SMTP id d34-v6mr12339542qte.246.1525128519816; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.8.102] ([181.203.105.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m28-v6sm7581049qta.67.2018.04.30.15.48.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Message-Id: <80A2384D-2DFF-4996-AF37-1D8CCE161D31@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_25360FD6-2A1B-4454-9353-38950E3475A5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:48:30 -0300
In-Reply-To: <152476315171.22993.18212137716941814070.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation@ietf.org, tokbind-chairs@ietf.org, unbearable@ietf.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
References: <152476315171.22993.18212137716941814070.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unbearable/rM9clpM-Ezu3aplSYF9SxnNKflY>
Subject: Re: [Unbearable] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_?= =?utf-8?q?draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-11=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: unbearable@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "\"This list is for discussion of proposals for doing better than bearer tokens \(e.g. HTTP cookies, OAuth tokens etc.\) for web applications. The specific goal is chartering a WG focused on preventing security token export and replay attacks.\"" <unbearable.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/unbearable/>
List-Post: <mailto:unbearable@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unbearable>, <mailto:unbearable-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 22:48:44 -0000

Hi Mirja

Because of differences between TLS 1.2 and 1.3 we split the TLS 1.3 considerations into a separate spec

In trying to organize the WG’s documents we split TLS1.3 into its own document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-tls13/>

Basically the negotiation will use Encrypted extensions in TLS 1.3 so TLS 1.3 is out of scope for this spec.

I hope we can progress the TLS 1.3 spec quickly as TLS1.3 itself is nearing the end of it’s long road to become a RFC.

Regards
John B.

> On Apr 26, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation-11: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tokbind-negotiation/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> One quick question: Why does this spec not cover TLS1.3?
> 
>