Let's go 'Informational'
<DRademac@apcc.com> Fri, 31 July 1998 20:47 UTC
Delivery-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:47:10 -0400
Return-Path: owner-ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id QAA29943 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:47:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id QAA00684 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA06499; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:42:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from apccorp.apcc.com (apccorp.apcc.com [159.215.19.1]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA06491; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:42:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: DRademac@apcc.com
Received: from ns-inet-wkg.apcc.com by apccorp.apcc.com with SMTP id QAA14484; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:41:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ns-inet-wkg.apcc.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.2 (600.1 3-26-1998)) id 85256652.0071A2D3 ; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:41:12 -0400
X-Lotus-FromDomain: APCC
To: ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Message-ID: <85256652.00716BC6.00@ns-inet-wkg.apcc.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:41:24 -0400
Subject: Let's go 'Informational'
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
I agree with Adam (not about all the IETF process issues mind you, but about going to informational). The MIB is good where it stands. Let's give it a label that has a better connotation than 'historic'. - Doug Rademacher APC
- Let's go 'Informational' DRademac