Let's go 'Informational' -Reply
Ron Pitt <rpitt@email.exide.com> Mon, 03 August 1998 15:06 UTC
Delivery-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 11:06:09 -0400
Return-Path: owner-ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id LAA20976 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:06:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id LAA03946 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id LAA05353; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:00:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from auth1.interpath.net (auth1.interpath.net [199.72.1.129]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id KAA05341; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from email.exide.com (thor.exide.com [199.72.243.1]) by auth1.interpath.net (8.8.5/v1.0) with SMTP id KAA22556 for <ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU>; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 10:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from WPDOMRAL-Message_Server by email.exide.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 03 Aug 1998 10:59:34 -0400
Message-Id: <s5c59816.092@email.exide.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 11:03:39 -0400
From: Ron Pitt <rpitt@email.exide.com>
To: DRademac@apcc.com, ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Subject: Let's go 'Informational' -Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Informational works for me. Ron Pitt >>> <DRademac@apcc.com> 07/31/98 01:41pm >>> I agree with Adam (not about all the IETF process issues mind you, but about going to informational). The MIB is good where it stands. Let's give it a label that has a better connotation than 'historic'. - Doug Rademacher APC
- Let's go 'Informational' -Reply Ron Pitt
- Re: Let's go 'Informational' -Reply Chris Herzog