IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus? RFC1628 to Historic

"C. Adam Stolinski" <astolinski@worldnet.att.net> Fri, 31 July 1998 19:44 UTC

Delivery-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:44:49 -0400
Return-Path: owner-ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA28843 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:44:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA00282 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:44:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA00524; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:32:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.38]) by CS.UTK.EDU with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id PAA00510; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 367140823worldnet.att.net ([12.72.32.87]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.03 118 118 102) with SMTP id <19980731160705.YWQS5585@367140823worldnet.att.net>; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:07:05 +0000
Reply-To: "C. Adam Stolinski" <astolinski@worldnet.att.net>
From: "C. Adam Stolinski" <astolinski@worldnet.att.net>
To: Maria Greene <maria@xedia.com>, Bert Wijnen <WIJNEN@VNET.IBM.COM>
Cc: ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Subject: Re: Consensus? RFC1628 to Historic
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:06:36 -0700
Message-ID: <01bdbc9d$31be89e0$0d23480c@367140823worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3

"Informational" would certainly resolve my concerns.  If there is some
admin WG work to get this done - I will volunteer to participate.

Regards,
Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: Maria Greene <maria@xedia.com>
To: Bert Wijnen <WIJNEN@VNET.IBM.COM>
Cc: ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU <ups-mib@CS.UTK.EDU>
Date: Thursday, July 30, 1998 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus? RFC1628 to Historic


>
>Bert, you are quite right. Would "Informational" status relieve
>people's concerns? If not, please speak up.
>
>Maria
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email