Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 26 April 2012 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148EA21F87D1 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.63
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.63 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2itLsfdBMbf for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CBF21F87DA for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so849617vcb.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=PDfUQB2UxYUxP/FRsvdXoXYrLlDzoYSMMz6qDBQ16gM=; b=d0uplH09nJS6CDBg22tilrl9vDEH/O6QfCQpvOkOsraYuZ7mKHw9mozqwTvkTi5rja zDz6dg9Guw8ZdLilb+ss5tPB364qE8zeTPlVzjdYDZFg197SBuY8ABDmnCvMGuiYJ5sa a5d3U64RRj2AwEdNGxD5YRTUDXIWeFobIZqmK21YaTbhRIS9dlD0NwCjNjsmkava8WqF 3kxhgC+LYoaRBVSDdF6La3iD4kWFSp58gqcJjor4UhxRp3qWIgWMX35NnxNRkD7veIje 3PPMY8Bnok6S14n9o0m4P4GB5WN8osCgILRuJYmGOEY9w86e7sHgRB1HlYW0b3wzU/SK S7zw==
Received: by 10.52.91.72 with SMTP id cc8mr5589492vdb.17.1335432784013; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.107.199 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120426093707.GE27002@newphantom.local>
References: <20120426092725.GC27002@newphantom.local> <DAE97705-CFFF-4E41-B811-B9E14F2F8EDB@edvina.net> <20120426093707.GE27002@newphantom.local>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:32:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=Yz214B0j4_+_zRDsx3hLuKppC5TERLD5bRaJrA9V5Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpMh1jfG3bsab92N5161UeDiDzxPQp+Nt6frw49aDtl1NlCUME78hnfY18jCfERH9qhKX7
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:22:19 -0700
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org, "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:33:05 -0000

2012/4/26 Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>nl>:
> There is no formal relation between the IP version used for SIP and used
> for RTP.  This is what I am proposing to solve with sip6:

A SIP UA could just use IPv4 for signaling and IPv4 and IPv6 for
media. SIP gateways usually use different address for signaling and
media.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>