Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 26 April 2012 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9718521F871C; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vz0icsOmGv2y; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B254221F86F2; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7b18ae000000dce-db-4f9920a2f334
Authentication-Results: mailgw2.ericsson.se x-tls.subject="/CN=esessmw0256"; auth=fail (cipher=AES128-SHA)
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client CN "esessmw0256", Issuer "esessmw0256" (not verified)) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 04.CC.03534.2A0299F4; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:17:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.64]) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.96]) with mapi; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:17:06 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:17:03 +0200
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme
Thread-Index: Ac0jja8cJzUwloUpTjKg2kzNHWWfnAAB6CYg
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05852C441F106E@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <20120426092725.GC27002@newphantom.local>
In-Reply-To: <20120426092725.GC27002@newphantom.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:22:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:17:08 -0000

Hi,

Maybe you could describe the use-case you have in mind, and what you want to achieve, and then we can look at possible solutions.

Regards,

Christer


-----Original Message-----
From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rick van Rein
Sent: 26. huhtikuuta 2012 12:27
To: uri-review@ietf.org; sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme

Hello,

I am developing to get better support for SIP over IPv6.  One of the problems that I have encountered is the interoperability between endpoints that run only IPv4 or IPv6.  To solve this situations prior to call setup, I am proposing a sip6 URI scheme.  Using this, end users and their tools should have an easier time deciding whether or not to use the URI.

A similar thing applies to enforced ZRTP --being sure before calling that the call will be private-- and I combined that with the URI scheme proposal, so as not to register more URI schemes than required.

Your feedback is kindly welcomed.

Best wishes,

Rick van Rein
OpenFortress