IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Sun, 31 May 2020 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBD83A0BDD for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zjm9oxgqiEuV for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205873A0E53 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.72.49]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LfU6x-1jCOn030eX-00p12x; Sun, 31 May 2020 21:02:15 +0200
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 15:02:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>, uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <635829576.405068.1590951735546@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <5ED3F66B.7204.10663FF@dan.tobias.name>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com>, <1435838702.391137.1590841215132@email.ionos.com>, <DM6PR18MB270066320792DAC3091C6DA4F98C0@DM6PR18MB2700.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <5ED3F66B.7204.10663FF@dan.tobias.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev31
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:f24uWMXj6ouSN/SlL4TUXnMuclzFNqYrp0Pqz9f7uYF8uivJsdO rZiqdbw/cH+4IP6bL2fuBNEr26pQAN0V7OAb7WajNMOUD45tuwpOBetqzVydpB+kShbVY/i JgOmwOpU0B9MjZ/3rk5bAjaz7ONvOQK2QwgUcAPHukuEYByM67I2xd7gqjwYvJGQopoHwtP l04ax/B/VYYLAu7YAfSAQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qwk07gQ+/Is=:HsB3/0e/R+AGO6kPAOmhda jiRMms9zBosuFqcjPnVWlhDhMSgQhSHTLJT3BadQCL1o7hYk1sdpvHRg2G9laNqyb+vdGMf9o pak2q7avD+bl8Z8Mf15BBiMQ5JX1lIkVT7gLJUV49MriIe2lnN6lZc8AHRAQnaQzk/MzmofyQ qcoFdQ+FkiYLswUTjmriTIcr+ZOOnO+XU99y0N5sxizlTh/EMgpuvU2Wktv1KeE6HBYbijcFq Za7Ru0EajQ7j1jTDJjt1VHqJdjfY/pj8HJlW+VaNzmwaX2/qsZbkyTiIZripKG6R6P3KPj6g8 Ro2lIwnTUTsETT8EFL7a0a0gCuxwU5s9BXR94Pl3VqD7TIizfubhGq7UPujzZHWQ6ttUfAzR3 1v2n1kowl+JVJFkcq5WtWslAyOREsUP77DnPpXa2NggWVwtqtURlMiJi/WKshzA/1MBYvd9nE BMdJOthI75TtD0bvr5TpSwm7IgroAY5oSAwAUvr/Wg4RUh/qRjnnZ/52G8SOHNivDkSP7MqB0 z9YhVI3wQNROmg088uwe/dlxNzDss3qnhZlyjvU21KGbVJNppnhHkdE/o9hrK12jrJc4rEo38 Bz7gs0BokfPjaSao4ZuG8LUHRRJVwYAd//w4yN+B2ot9Q1oOHfcR0ZziTJTe5gB6iBm4RT+ow g7PZeKurgFlzZ4VotVLrKYSOUKX9r5NnGCoaPe/zG111Y0zDnv7nNdkiJnaJQipWaqCbzSUOk CReOthyvWGEAJkAem9gkYiDXF83P+0BLHRzYB0mv8f2o7WL2mQQIyp6JL8c40nOrZ3Qf/PtPY QDAG48lK/t2YRoN7P9+AbdmbPQyhI0YWbfbk97wmYI2M+ffoHqqDIAuY+WStIg5UcKdHVzr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/14p_r0VP2xMlQ7TgLScKdvMQen0>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 19:02:54 -0000

I am bringing a product to market.  In the draft it says dropexample.com and my email, as you know, my is dropnumber.com.  So its drop number, not drop colon.  Your struggle is over.


On May 31, 2020 at 2:24 PM "Daniel R. Tobias" < dan@tobias.name> wrote:


On 30 May 2020 at 14:01, Michael Wojcik wrote:

To be honest, I don't understand why you're being so difficult about
this. What's your motive for trying to find grounds in 3986 for
repurposing the fragment identifier?
I'm struggling to figure out what the guy's true agenda is, too; why
he's so wedded to the nonstandard syntax he is proposing. Maybe he's
got an implementation out there somewhere with the quirky syntax
embedded that he doesn't want to have to change?

--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://domains.dan.info/


_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email