Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sat, 22 October 2011 04:47 UTC
Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7D621F8A4E for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.355
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, URI_HEX=0.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GnYtZOWfYTkp for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC9F21F854F for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkas6 with SMTP id s6so6503619bka.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zq+x7lx0LzCDA72jXNKi0yJb9CFvXDwMvuaDXRAN+BE=; b=tp7G8R0t4gEuCx/qVLpF2t2PpZL4xb6QkQ7XtKMFx3YsWE2JfG5x4gZ304ja82pQzw +KaA+V+QfjBfVXtypHubAE+c5GAfBybuBrzAddcFGaibakwjKF0cs+WjrUnThMSslo7Z PJg1pwa6gBvvmBmF3xjJwJDAti9/JxUZJ7WUg=
Received: by 10.223.14.3 with SMTP id e3mr26499166faa.25.1319258876428; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y17sm6772087faf.1.2011.10.21.21.47.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4EA24B23.3010900@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:48:35 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: uri-review@ietf.org
References: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:47:59 -0000
Bob, The IRI WG has reached the consensus to remove the statement you were guided by in the 4395bis. It hasn't been the current practice, I and I don't recommend you to proceed with the registration. Thanks, Mykyta Yevstifeyev 11.10.2011 2:30, Bob Van Zant wrote: > It looks like most URI schemes like this one are never registered with > IANA. It seems like The Right Thing to do and so I present to the list > the URI scheme com-eventbrite-attendee. > > > URI scheme name. > com-eventbrite-attendee > > Status. > provisional > > URI scheme syntax. > uri = "com-eventbrite-attendee:" method [ "?" query ] > method = "resetpassword" / "tickets" > > Example: > > com-eventbrite-attendee:resetpassword?email=user%40domain.com&token=DEADBEEF > > URI scheme semantics. > This scheme is intended to be used by operating systems that have the > Eventbrite Attendee application installed. When a URI with > this scheme is encountered it is expected that the operating system > launches the Eventbrite Attendee application with the method and > query parameters specified in the URI. > > The exact semantics for how URL information is communicated to the > Eventbrite Attendee app may vary on an operating system basis. The > expectation is simply that the operating system follows its own > conventions for passing the method and query parameters into the > application. > > Encoding considerations. > The scheme and method portions of this proposed URI avoid encoding > issues by limiting itself to a subset of ASCII. > > The query portion of a com-eventbrite-attendee URI shall be encoded > according to the rules in RFC 3986. > > Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name. > > - Eventbrite Attendee for iOS > - Eventbrite Attendee for Android > > Interoperability considerations. > none. > > Security considerations. > Against recommendations in RFC 3986 section 7.5 a > com-eventbrite-attendee: URI may be used to transmit sensitive > information. For example, it may be used to communicate a password > reset token in email for a user following a "Forgot your password" > flow. Though this token may have transmitted over insecure channels > on its way to the application care must still be taken by > application developers to not divulge this secret. > > RFC 3986 sections 7.2 and 7.5 apply > > Contact. > Bob Van Zant > Eventbrite > 651 Brannan St > San Francisco, CA 94103 > USA > > EMail: bob@eventbrite.com > > Author/Change controller. > Bob Van Zant > > References. > > Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform > Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, > January 2005. > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >
- [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mark Baker
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst