Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sat, 22 October 2011 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7D621F8A4E for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.355
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, URI_HEX=0.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GnYtZOWfYTkp for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC9F21F854F for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkas6 with SMTP id s6so6503619bka.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zq+x7lx0LzCDA72jXNKi0yJb9CFvXDwMvuaDXRAN+BE=; b=tp7G8R0t4gEuCx/qVLpF2t2PpZL4xb6QkQ7XtKMFx3YsWE2JfG5x4gZ304ja82pQzw +KaA+V+QfjBfVXtypHubAE+c5GAfBybuBrzAddcFGaibakwjKF0cs+WjrUnThMSslo7Z PJg1pwa6gBvvmBmF3xjJwJDAti9/JxUZJ7WUg=
Received: by 10.223.14.3 with SMTP id e3mr26499166faa.25.1319258876428; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y17sm6772087faf.1.2011.10.21.21.47.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4EA24B23.3010900@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:48:35 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: uri-review@ietf.org
References: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:47:59 -0000

Bob,

The IRI WG has reached the consensus to remove the statement you were 
guided by in the 4395bis.  It hasn't been the current practice, I and I 
don't recommend you to proceed with the registration.

Thanks,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

11.10.2011 2:30, Bob Van Zant wrote:
> It looks like most URI schemes like this one are never registered with
> IANA. It seems like The Right Thing to do and so I present to the list
> the URI scheme com-eventbrite-attendee.
>
>
> URI scheme name.
>      com-eventbrite-attendee
>
> Status.
>      provisional
>
> URI scheme syntax.
>      uri = "com-eventbrite-attendee:" method [ "?" query ]
>      method = "resetpassword" / "tickets"
>
>      Example:
>
>          com-eventbrite-attendee:resetpassword?email=user%40domain.com&token=DEADBEEF
>
> URI scheme semantics.
>      This scheme is intended to be used by operating systems that have the
>      Eventbrite Attendee application installed. When a URI with
>      this scheme is encountered it is expected that the operating system
>      launches the Eventbrite Attendee application with the method and
>      query parameters specified in the URI.
>
>      The exact semantics for how URL information is communicated to the
>      Eventbrite Attendee app may vary on an operating system basis. The
>      expectation is simply that the operating system follows its own
>      conventions for passing the method and query parameters into the
>      application.
>
> Encoding considerations.
>      The scheme and method portions of this proposed URI avoid encoding
>      issues by limiting itself to a subset of ASCII.
>
>      The query portion of a com-eventbrite-attendee URI shall be encoded
>      according to the rules in RFC 3986.
>
> Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name.
>
>      - Eventbrite Attendee for iOS
>      - Eventbrite Attendee for Android
>
> Interoperability considerations.
>      none.
>
> Security considerations.
>      Against recommendations in RFC 3986 section 7.5 a
>      com-eventbrite-attendee: URI may be used to transmit sensitive
>      information. For example, it may be used to communicate a password
>      reset token in email for a user following a "Forgot your password"
>      flow. Though this token may have transmitted over insecure channels
>      on its way to the application care must still be taken by
>      application developers to not divulge this secret.
>
>      RFC 3986 sections 7.2 and 7.5 apply
>
> Contact.
>      Bob Van Zant
>      Eventbrite
>      651 Brannan St
>      San Francisco, CA 94103
>      USA
>
>      EMail: bob@eventbrite.com
>
> Author/Change controller.
>      Bob Van Zant
>
> References.
>
>      Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
>      Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986,
>      January 2005.
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>