IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request to review sieve URI scheme

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 01 December 2008 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <uri-review-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-uri-review-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC813A682F; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 02:18:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1513A682F for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 02:18:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.181, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vm++okpdmXOA for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 02:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728343A63EC for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 02:18:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [92.40.71.113] (92.40.71.113.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.71.113]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <STO52gBa-0tK@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:18:10 +0000
Message-ID: <4933B9B4.3060108@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:17:24 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <4932D3D9.2020703@isode.com> <6.0.0.20.2.20081201113852.097756e0@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20081201113852.097756e0@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request to review sieve URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Martin,

Martin Duerst wrote:

>I had a look at parts of it. One thing I looked through is whether it's
>clear where (percent-encoded) UTF-8 can be used; that seems to be fine.
>
>It might help the reader if the grammar rules were reordered to
>read top-down. Currently it's top-down first, but then bottom-up.
>  
>
Good point. I've reordered them.

>Another thing I noticed is that characters such as "&" and "="
>are listed as needing percent-encoding. I don't see them being
>used in the syntax, so it wouldn't be necessary to percent-encode
>them. Or are they reserved for future extensions?
>  
>
Yes. I don't have any extensions in mind yet, but I thought it would be 
better to allow for them.

Thank you,
Alexey

>Regards,    Martin.
>
>At 02:56 08/12/01, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>I am finishing draft-ietf-sieve-managesieve-02.txt which defines the sieve: URI scheme. So I would like to ask people to review section 3 of the draft.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Alexey
>>    
>>

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email