Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Schemes rtsp, rtsps and rtspu
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 27 April 2012 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0BD21F8688 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfRgcqnkjJys for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D2321F8698 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so690131vbb.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0KyhAzx9+FsKCNcVJ4St2+Ab+KS73h6JG96VgGznPwg=; b=XXR0D2Xa3AlWj484cDIRSK8IllOgy7dZ5Qlnl9r9Llw+jx++lkd/dkUCroK4nB8EJB a64xMo/4TCdUwbcBi21nosO/vWj1TsZVjkid9tfzkTtk7SN8Qr/rvYxAIXz0GNSzD2KJ k86wQj2yRANevx/Dss99fyPv3AQQJ5qIpuqp7dFcGiE6WkUaxXCnK9k7FT9t/xsz5cMP XdTkYyph9z+9i3zNRweXB2dWKUdfuW5+8D2C4B3EV9dU113TSpFCT6qYxp7OqdKr40MD KrYLSbBpcZtsIqM/0pEstT5OXLG3EXqMiU2B1cURa+jnw4zTvPPsX7X24AXvcBZrAnJ/ BzBA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.149.79 with SMTP id s15mr11419694vcv.60.1335537639681; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.162.99 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F99665D.8060404@ericsson.com>
References: <4F99665D.8060404@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:40:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAvr6eXHzB_HMVgGqBHpUpeuh-mrWRP6-Ap0w3SZLvV-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, "mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Schemes rtsp, rtsps and rtspu
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:40:41 -0000
Howdy, The registrations below note that there were changes in URI syntax. I could not find a summary of them in 2326bis; can you provide a pointer? rtsp was already registered in the URI Schemes registry as permanent; significant changes to the syntax would probably require minting a new scheme to avoid the interoperability problems you note below. regards, Ted On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There is currently an ongoing WG last call on RTSP 2.0. > The WGLC ends on May 16th, 2012. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis/ > > > 22.14. URI Schemes > > This specification defines two URI schemes ("rtsp" and "rtsps") and > reserves a third one ("rtspu"). These URI schemes are defined in > existing registries which are not created by RTSP. Registrations are > following RFC 4395[RFC4395]. > > 22.14.1. The rtsp URI Scheme > > URI scheme name: rtsp > > Status: Permanent > > URI scheme syntax: See Section 20.2.1 of RFC XXXX. > > URI scheme semantics: The rtsp scheme is used to indicate resources > accessible through the usage of the Real-time Streaming > Protocol (RTSP). RTSP allows different operations on the > resource identified by the URI, but the primary purpose is the > streaming delivery of the resource to a client. However, the > operations that are currently defined are: DESCRIBE, > GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS, PLAY, PLAY_NOTIFY, PAUSE, SETUP, > SET_PARAMETER, and TEARDOWN. > > Encoding considerations: IRIs in this scheme are defined and needs > to be encoded as RTSP URIs when used within the RTSP protocol. > That encoding is done according to RFC 3987. > > Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name: RTSP 1.0 (RFC > 2326), RTSP 2.0 (RFC XXXX) > > > > > > Schulzrinne, et al. Expires September 13, 2012 [Page 222] > > Internet-Draft Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP) March 2012 > > > Interoperability considerations: The change in URI syntax performed > between RTSP 1.0 and 2.0 can create interoperability issues. > > Security considerations: All the security threats identified in > Section 7 of RFC 3986 applies also to this scheme. They need > to be reviewed and considered in any implementation utilizing > this scheme. > > Contact: Magnus Westerlund, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > > Author/Change controller: IETF > > References: RFC 2326, RFC 3986, RFC 3987, RFC XXXX > > 22.14.2. The rtsps URI Scheme > > URI scheme name: rtsps > > Status: Permanent > > URI scheme syntax: See Section 20.2.1 of RFC XXXX. > > URI scheme semantics: The rtsps scheme is used to indicate resources > accessible through the usage of the Real-time Streaming > Protocol (RTSP) over TLS. RTSP allows different operations on > the resource identified by the URI, but the primary purpose is > the streaming delivery of the resource to a client. However, > the operations that are currently defined are: DESCRIBE, > GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS, PLAY, PLAY_NOTIFY, PAUSE, SETUP, > SET_PARAMETER, and TEARDOWN. > > Encoding considerations: IRIs in this scheme are defined and needs > to be encoded as RTSP URIs when used within the RTSP protocol. > That encoding is done according to RFC 3987. > > Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name: RTSP 1.0 (RFC > 2326), RTSP 2.0 (RFC XXXX) > > Interoperability considerations: The change in URI syntax performed > between RTSP 1.0 and 2.0 can create interoperability issues. > > Security considerations: All the security threats identified in > Section 7 of RFC 3986 applies also to this scheme. They need > to be reviewed and considered in any implementation utilizing > this scheme. > > > > > > > Schulzrinne, et al. Expires September 13, 2012 [Page 223] > > Internet-Draft Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP) March 2012 > > > Contact: Magnus Westerlund, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > > Author/Change controller: IETF > > References: RFC 2326, RFC 3986, RFC 3987, RFC XXXX > > 22.14.3. The rtspu URI Scheme > > URI scheme name: rtspu > > Status: Permanent > > URI scheme syntax: See Section 3.2 of RFC 2326. > > URI scheme semantics: The rtspu scheme is used to indicate resources > accessible through the usage of the Real-time Streaming > Protocol (RTSP) over unreliable datagram transport. RTSP > allows different operations on the resource identified by the > URI, but the primary purpose is the streaming delivery of the > resource to a client. However, the operations that are > currently defined are: DESCRIBE, GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS, PLAY, > PLAY_NOTIFY, PAUSE, SETUP, SET_PARAMETER, and TEARDOWN. > > Encoding considerations: IRIs in this scheme are not defined. > > Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name: RTSP 1.0 (RFC > 2326) > > Interoperability considerations: The definition of the transport > mechanism of RTSP over UDP has interoperability issues. That > makes the usage of this scheme problematic. > > Security considerations: All the security threats identified in > Section 7 of RFC 3986 applies also to this scheme. They needs > to be reviewed and considered in any implementation utilizing > this scheme. > > Contact: Magnus Westerlund, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > > Author/Change controller: IETF > > References: RFC 2326 > > > -- > > Magnus Westerlund > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
- [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Scheme… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Martin J. Dürst