Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
"Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name> Sat, 20 May 2006 14:44 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhShM-0002tI-8B; Sat, 20 May 2006 10:44:56 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhShK-0002tA-Qs for uri-review@ietf.org; Sat, 20 May 2006 10:44:54 -0400
Received: from pippin.dreamhost.com ([66.33.211.27]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FhShG-0005Wf-IF for uri-review@ietf.org; Sat, 20 May 2006 10:44:54 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (68-71-210-152.atlsfl.adelphia.net [68.71.210.152]) by pippin.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C317109EAB; Sat, 20 May 2006 07:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
Organization: Barely
To: Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com>, uri-review@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:46:44 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
Message-ID: <446EF394.9262.34160E7E@dan.tobias.name>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <1D4A05136773CF4DB373F6FE4E1031500DABF52C@df-pug-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.31)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-description: Mail message body
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc:
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org
On 11 May 2006 at 14:51, Andrey Shur wrote: [long line re-wrapped in accordance with RFC 2822] > This mail is sending to request the submission of the "pack" Uri > scheme registration template (attached) for review. Was there any reason to put this plain-ASCII template in a proprietary-format, 50 kilobyte, MS Word attachment instead of as plain text? Was there any reason to send the single-line cover letter as a multipart MIME message with a heap of grotesque MS Office HTML code (when, in fact, no special formatting was done to the message)? Micro$oft strikes again... I wouldn't trust that company's "engineers" to have any part in the Internet standards process. -- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/ _______________________________________________ Uri-review mailing list Uri-review@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
- [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Gregg Brown
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Jerry Dunietz
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Jerry Dunietz
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Jerry Dunietz
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Roy T. Fielding
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Roy T. Fielding
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- [Uri-review] Request for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Frank Ellermann