Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Schemes rtsp, rtsps and rtspu
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 08 May 2012 17:55 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9690621F8569 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.593
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.593 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sybrdc6yGgHg for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DED521F8565 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so1820953vbb.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 May 2012 10:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sK7cj8gKFVFge6i/veC1FgNpIMosUbGeSBVNvJfYKsE=; b=SGuQMB6KuDdjRPqBA4sXoUk6Pw1ON8TT2lE9rUEgxQff/qwWRxGA/a60cDiUoMrCLm 2xHId3tBBhguLaiDnFLHTad0PW5N4JhVAilXyIjdAyuu5ZDgVcM12UoQ7UphwUNPj4nB ro6rdnQ900S6aORkDF/kKdL35dlyEzkzVipXskJHTdy+xuOw9TrOh9K7hJNTXfWa2RBd 1Ip3blep1Cw1EcVwYFljzTjNWC3/Cx3nmjjwejdWuVwCAmqoCS+PPtVZEk8QwJayf5MM DMODjPvoZSMd27t1dcs1uZpY6/BPnJzI/mBiUQcJoi8H/UypOVdL3v5U/WxexCkcQiXu uHjA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.20.228 with SMTP id q4mr431864vde.56.1336499758029; Tue, 08 May 2012 10:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.162.99 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FA95C23.3030802@gmx.de>
References: <4F99665D.8060404@ericsson.com> <CA+9kkMAvr6eXHzB_HMVgGqBHpUpeuh-mrWRP6-Ap0w3SZLvV-Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FA13522.6020103@ericsson.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D194AD547DE@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <4FA8EB2E.8070609@ericsson.com> <4FA8F231.90407@gmx.de> <CA+9kkMCOatpOO2P5c0PxSt=CKfUCG2pOaKYNkP-e-80ianps1Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FA95C23.3030802@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 10:55:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBzae-tcMSjidwLF5kD5_FD1soNDGOgWA+jLLH0QYVLfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Schemes rtsp, rtsps and rtspu
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 17:55:59 -0000
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2012-05-08 19:11, Ted Hardie wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Can't I even say that fragments is not allowed for a scheme? >>> >>> >>> No. >> >> >> I'm not sure I agree with this. If a registration is intended to >> create an identifier that has no associated resource (and thus no > > > A URI has an associated resource *by definition*. > > The interesting question is whether there's a way to retrieve a sequence of > octets describing it... Well, perhaps a less theoretical distinction would be whether or not what a URI is associated can have a media type. A media type for mailto:ted.ietf@gmail.com is not really sensible; a fragment for that identifier is thus not sensible. Ted /who is not yet a sequence of octets
- [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Scheme… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] In WG last call review of URI Sc… Martin J. Dürst