Re: [Uri-review] Request for URI schemes assigned to OPC UA

Randy Armstrong <randy.armstrong@opcfoundation.org> Tue, 23 May 2017 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <randy.armstrong@opcfoundation.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E032F129B09 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2017 05:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opcfoundation.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cu5iOrM2SpuX for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2017 05:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0075.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5747129B1D for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 May 2017 05:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opcfoundation.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-opcfoundation-org; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=rf5w5FPnlZRLBopkU8NJ14i6YLXT8uZ37ysHfng86ac=; b=YTu024jk2R3tLp/aP5TwJZxi4k0F65WGvosfyeKSWsWg81LVUhql4Yo/IYMfsjSJ6pIkRh4COUaP05N/PCxxMJc/pOkgi0XSWCN525smJC9E6Ly7MAbBRuOO8PY9xk1NEP2qa/kQ3tZzJPTVq78IH0hG5mJ60zACOU96/HZPDks=
Received: from SN2PR0801MB606.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.160.15.18) by SN2PR0801MB607.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.160.15.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1101.14; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:30:19 +0000
Received: from SN2PR0801MB606.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.15.18]) by SN2PR0801MB606.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.15.18]) with mapi id 15.01.1101.019; Tue, 23 May 2017 12:30:19 +0000
From: Randy Armstrong <randy.armstrong@opcfoundation.org>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
CC: TCB <TCB@opcfoundation.org>
Thread-Topic: [Uri-review] Request for URI schemes assigned to OPC UA
Thread-Index: AQHS0zs4xLLbNXnzh0CKrnIIlBQkpKIBoXWAgAAvpJ4=
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:30:18 +0000
Message-ID: <SN2PR0801MB606CCA44CBB76C20B084165FAF90@SN2PR0801MB606.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <SN2PR0801MB606937F9F7215C2E994F5BEFAF80@SN2PR0801MB606.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>, <5923FBBF.6000409@ninebynine.org>
In-Reply-To: <5923FBBF.6000409@ninebynine.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ninebynine.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ninebynine.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=opcfoundation.org;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:111:e400:3411:cafe::1c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN2PR0801MB607; 7:huRT6TOJn2eyT2zSWS2Emz/9hcF6CW6+tZMvY3M1An+KG6Za7fdcDAkXZbLlLXMPKNftoqhR8XULRVYx2NeaLhWeta7YzSf1S3bNr2QmhnbpgyQSCrYwHHsfyRpmHULjmbeDtOpldCw4kebbDmxI8PozXQEzYsvqV6p3sNNMLdls/5IJH1mn63uV1PFvInT2iZcI2CXwen7u+YL7CGrhxvX0lQlYjztwz0fMIhbeyQGZ+6cdJNqJUc0VZiScEjdM/BGdrOCsNHXSW+mBAEs+8UATxwZAqNyIO+oeWM+YCoAM47/cPAWg3IEIaeNxcZrn5bgMNbmsmgjEpZzsORq0vg==
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN2PR0801MB607:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: afcd6613-7945-458d-30fa-08d4a1d7794f
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:SN2PR0801MB607;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN2PR0801MB6073040B1EB6FFD01F28EBBFAF90@SN2PR0801MB607.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(278428928389397);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148); SRVR:SN2PR0801MB607; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN2PR0801MB607;
x-forefront-prvs: 0316567485
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39830400002)(39400400002)(39450400003)(39410400002)(55885003)(377454003)(24454002)(7696004)(5660300001)(8936002)(966005)(46360400001)(2950100002)(6436002)(81166006)(7906003)(6116002)(2906002)(102836003)(478600001)(606005)(107886003)(77096006)(3280700002)(7736002)(229853002)(6246003)(6506006)(8676002)(4326008)(3660700001)(38730400002)(2501003)(53936002)(2900100001)(99286003)(55016002)(122556002)(25786009)(53546009)(74316002)(54896002)(6306002)(9686003)(76176999)(236005)(54356999)(33656002)(189998001)(50986999)(86362001)(70820200005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN2PR0801MB607; H:SN2PR0801MB606.namprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SN2PR0801MB606CCA44CBB76C20B084165FAF90SN2PR0801MB606na_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: opcfoundation.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 May 2017 12:30:18.9814 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2d8ef4e4-d41c-489c-8004-bb99304b60fe
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR0801MB607
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/3ILt64Ka59-L1Mc1pXxzftdY24w>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for URI schemes assigned to OPC UA
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:30:26 -0000

1) We use the schemes for URLs that identify multiple network paths to a single resource which is identified with a URI that uses the 'urn' scheme. It is not clear to me that registration is required for this usage. Please advise.


2) The specs is an IEC specification as well (see https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/21993 ). In addition, the text quoted is old. Anyone can download the specifications from the OPC Foundation website today.













________________________________
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:07:11 AM
To: Randy Armstrong; uri-review@ietf.org
Cc: TCB
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for URI schemes assigned to OPC UA

I have two objections here to permanent registration:

1. The specifications appear to be non-open "Note: Access to specifications and
developer resources are available to OPC Foundation members only."

2. The use of multiple URI schemes to access the same resource goes against
principles of web architecture [http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-aliases].

This topic has been discussed previously on this list: see thread at [1].

[1]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=uri-review&gbt=1&index=ze2I30iloSGZxlP2vAeCWcPOWus

#g
--



On 22/05/2017 22:04, Randy Armstrong wrote:
> Scheme name:
>
> opc.tcp       :  OPC UA Connection Protocol over TCP/IP
> opc.amqp  :  OPC UA Connection Protocol over AMQP
> opc.wss      :  OPC UA Connection Protocol over WebSockets
>
> We expect to add new schemes as time goes on.
>
> Status:  permanent
>
> Applications/protocols that use this scheme name:
>
> Applications which implement the OPC UA Connection Protocol defined by the OPC Unified Architecture specification:
> https://opcfoundation.org/developer-tools/specifications-unified-architecture
>
> The opc.tcp scheme has been in use in the field for about 10 years (we were unaware of the registration process).
> Note that the OPC Foundation has a trademark on the term "OPC" (see US Trademark #78732560)
>
> Contact:
> Randy Armstrong
> tcb@opcfoundation.org
>
> Change controller:
> OPC Foundation
> https://opcfoundation.org/
>
> References:
> The protocols and schemes are defined in Part 6: Mappings:
> http://www.opcfoundation.org/UA/Part6/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>