Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Mon, 24 October 2011 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B47821F8ACC for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.193
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.193 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, URI_HEX=0.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LdnCo4dtCnhI for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021AA21F8ABE for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkas6 with SMTP id s6so8861366bka.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rnX9HsJKXY4WmrEqMbtfiA3/TXKJEKBeoXhdyyiVaTI=; b=iAz36RJOVPtcJcdTHDEB4LB8pxjrvJnwWeYa6PxAxmcU5n6CZboo/HCFO+9a/sj5Vb iu+ihDqQ+Yh5tN4QvJNGwaCD2wy8RIMveWdKi+PaZ7o1VRPm5ok4DtvR9mtcPqErfbz+ Pm14BkEeKXjvSbkym0wwayYB3B1unJn+70DMg=
Received: by 10.223.77.6 with SMTP id e6mr40834096fak.32.1319431632946; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w7sm2454974fab.6.2011.10.23.21.47.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4EA4EDFB.3050406@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:47:55 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA24B23.3010900@gmail.com> <4EA33D70.6080500@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4EA33D70.6080500@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 04:47:15 -0000

23.10.2011 1:02, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> Hello Mykyta,
>
> On 2011/10/22 13:48, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>> Bob,
>>
>> The IRI WG has reached the consensus to remove the statement you were
>> guided by in the 4395bis.
>
> Can you say which statement you are referring to?

See http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/73; that's

>     Organizations that desire a private name space for URI scheme names
>     are encouraged to use a prefix based on their domain name, expressed
>     in reverse order.  For example, a URI scheme name of com-example-info
>     might be registered by the vendor that owns the example.com domain
>     name.

Mykyta

>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
>> It hasn't been the current practice, I and I
>> don't recommend you to proceed with the registration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>>
>> 11.10.2011 2:30, Bob Van Zant wrote:
>>> It looks like most URI schemes like this one are never registered with
>>> IANA. It seems like The Right Thing to do and so I present to the list
>>> the URI scheme com-eventbrite-attendee.
>>>
>>>
>>> URI scheme name.
>>> com-eventbrite-attendee
>>>
>>> Status.
>>> provisional
>>>
>>> URI scheme syntax.
>>> uri = "com-eventbrite-attendee:" method [ "?" query ]
>>> method = "resetpassword" / "tickets"
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> com-eventbrite-attendee:resetpassword?email=user%40domain.com&token=DEADBEEF 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> URI scheme semantics.
>>> This scheme is intended to be used by operating systems that have the
>>> Eventbrite Attendee application installed. When a URI with
>>> this scheme is encountered it is expected that the operating system
>>> launches the Eventbrite Attendee application with the method and
>>> query parameters specified in the URI.
>>>
>>> The exact semantics for how URL information is communicated to the
>>> Eventbrite Attendee app may vary on an operating system basis. The
>>> expectation is simply that the operating system follows its own
>>> conventions for passing the method and query parameters into the
>>> application.
>>>
>>> Encoding considerations.
>>> The scheme and method portions of this proposed URI avoid encoding
>>> issues by limiting itself to a subset of ASCII.
>>>
>>> The query portion of a com-eventbrite-attendee URI shall be encoded
>>> according to the rules in RFC 3986.
>>>
>>> Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name.
>>>
>>> - Eventbrite Attendee for iOS
>>> - Eventbrite Attendee for Android
>>>
>>> Interoperability considerations.
>>> none.
>>>
>>> Security considerations.
>>> Against recommendations in RFC 3986 section 7.5 a
>>> com-eventbrite-attendee: URI may be used to transmit sensitive
>>> information. For example, it may be used to communicate a password
>>> reset token in email for a user following a "Forgot your password"
>>> flow. Though this token may have transmitted over insecure channels
>>> on its way to the application care must still be taken by
>>> application developers to not divulge this secret.
>>>
>>> RFC 3986 sections 7.2 and 7.5 apply
>>>
>>> Contact.
>>> Bob Van Zant
>>> Eventbrite
>>> 651 Brannan St
>>> San Francisco, CA 94103
>>> USA
>>>
>>> EMail: bob@eventbrite.com
>>>
>>> Author/Change controller.
>>> Bob Van Zant
>>>
>>> References.
>>>
>>> Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
>>> Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986,
>>> January 2005.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Uri-review mailing list
>>> Uri-review@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Uri-review mailing list
>> Uri-review@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>>
>