IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme registration request - dchub

Fredrik Ullner <ullner@gmail.com> Sun, 13 October 2013 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ullner@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E34921F9473; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdFsVVDWqFur; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6F221F941F; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj1so6665015pad.14 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qw/Z1tC8dhHfKnuYx9k9y1F8uPM9aktycDNunNqPqvM=; b=O6BKKyjrIrepv/S/NNbaxZrg6IJSZfWwI2Sr42NRpGiL3zNVzveXvI7QlUTML34OHX PMJr9En/cwTXRUO0w6FkvCTbANMs38uV2vmh/F6BPcICIl8JaTz+TK21EecOl8YekWxi tjXcEx2CuME+egg+uUcSxXIuI9FuwwjT56tVOk8GL5pmDkEga1PVC1AH/Mbiz6vlIw3y DRxZ9mAeJekkqWNRoakP/mwmyjMdoX77Ip9s+JvZvsMF4hN+rLVaLIOWIKTTU/p7edcJ T5VtPXbMK0/MPhMLUtWYsDNsAMZ4AjFBEHk8Uq0X+zn8L0Q2nSCwX73KLqNEw/y8TMZi 4oiw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.121.201 with SMTP id lm9mr33375229pab.80.1381691927592; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.254.231 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOd=0fNA3OFG0_AH1ga8auUUrs7PbxGq1srGxZiox1NWGwO8eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOd=0fOPCgEwPWxOm3QDn=QKe8Rb8RmShn5sEL3iBS_z6aOUXg@mail.gmail.com> <512663B2.20809@tibco.com> <CAOd=0fPuFsoTCh0mcYt_vVi-=Y5Or4oNQT+BYpKZv1zop0vdHA@mail.gmail.com> <51278B10.10200@ninebynine.org> <CAOd=0fMyEVHgQnzZpoH3wXws+T30V5O82u13nFwA+A=4FwQbnQ@mail.gmail.com> <513CAD82.409@ninebynine.org> <513E26F5.9080207@tibco.com> <CAOd=0fNA3OFG0_AH1ga8auUUrs7PbxGq1srGxZiox1NWGwO8eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 21:18:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOd=0fPV3d=xBt_BH4vsG5aN5rNqjbAAzrdvxFnzFPXv_xbQag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fredrik Ullner <ullner@gmail.com>
To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e4ca488848704e8a4383d"
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme registration request - dchub
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:18:48 -0000

Hi,

There is now a new version of the dchub URI scheme proposal at <
http://nmdc.sourceforge.net/Versions/nmdc-uri-scheme-0.4.txt<http://nmdc.sourceforge.net/Versions/nmdc-uri-scheme-0.3.txt>>.
The following changes have been made:

* The "Applications/protocols" section revamped to be more generic, so it
doesn't have to specify each implementation.
* Changed from Permanent to Provisional; this is to make sure that the
scheme will be accepted as a first step (possibly later filing a permanent
one, if people find that the scheme provides ample information to deem it
worthy of permanent status).

For other (minor changes), please see the SVN.

If people are satisfied with the current scheme specification, I will
proceed to submit it to the appropriate IETF list.


-- 
Fredrik Ullner

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email