[Uri-review] Request for sftp URI scheme
Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl> Wed, 26 September 2018 07:53 UTC
Return-Path: <rick@openfortress.nl>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC561130E1B for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=openfortress.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WF06X4mPLfSM for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net [194.109.24.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CD1130E1A for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from popmini.vanrein.org ([IPv6:2001:980:93a5:1::7]) by smtp-cloud8.xs4all.net with ESMTP id 54dFgjWYvgyCD54dGgONgs; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:53:15 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=openfortress.nl; i=rick@openfortress.nl; q=dns/txt; s=fame; t=1537948393; h=message-id : date : from : mime-version : to : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : date : from : subject; bh=eYQBljOVnEWQi2XZnlT3u10rO0yeyn6grHKoTD6VhwQ=; b=Ejak3bjlwsW3tSMz6WSSs+MfGY1xjZeOKP3F3rB1q4N0sr3XZzAjHVmP cIHu5ntYtUvntD3uLf50JVMZDMlOXA0yMThHdHk9EisbEd8e6XP7dW/9D/ 1JvijMZoZDRM4gdOvn9mF3cNLplWd4NKIGsNIhTP+Zh0XmiLNl+TNdvHc=
Received: by fame.vanrein.org (Postfix, from userid 1006) id 958181DCDB; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:53:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietf.org
Received: from airhead.local (phantom.vanrein.org [83.161.146.46]) by fame.vanrein.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 12B691DCD4; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5BAB3AE1.2090603@openfortress.nl>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:53:05 +0200
From: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.520000, version=1.2.4
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDE+2Jk/LUITXjwWvCww1gKEqZLs0SXcoEtSoxLTWRYvQzIZJs8eQDACf4G6I87g9zkhyZEo3g5RswKqe2KpXJghafV4uZmFLb4iUUvycLHJeU74bdwM KnXpbyOTMCtCVJUnVYb3B+BWh9P92/9mNkcn9oFEhNuXv53z7rZV16f4ztQKSuxJxdbc7zKHBT/maw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/7J5B9fLHDLUqVdoWWElMEP9ENCg>
Subject: [Uri-review] Request for sftp URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:53:23 -0000
Hello, This is a registration that seems to be long overdue (and we need it). Confusion in implementations already seems to exist, at least I've once seen the use of "ssh:" in a place where "sftp:" should have been used. Looking at the spec of "ssh:" this is "like telnet" and so not menat for file transfer, so I would like to propose "sftp:" based on the same documentation as originally used for "ssh:" registration. Scheme name: sftp Status: Provisional Applications/protocols that use this scheme name: WinSCP, https://winscp.net/eng/docs/session_url Konqueror / KIO, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVE84xgRrNE Plus, we intend to include it into ARPA2 Reservoir, to connect to remote object stores across realm boundaries, using standardised and secure URIs. Proper authentication will be the starting point for refined access control, which can also allow remote users in. http://reservoir.arpa2.net http://idp.arpa2.net/radius.html Contact: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl> Change controller: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl> Architect for the InternetWide.org project. References: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Shell http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-secsh-scp-sftp-ssh-uri Thanks, Rick van Rein OpenFortress / InternetWide / ARPA2
- [Uri-review] Request for sftp URI scheme Rick van Rein
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for sftp URI scheme Ira McDonald
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for sftp URI scheme Rick van Rein
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for sftp URI scheme Graham Klyne