Re: [Uri-review] Fwd: Registration request: did URI scheme

Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> Tue, 15 May 2018 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6877E12DA17 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 06:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eod8X3JtOKWD for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 06:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.digitalbazaar.com (mail.digitalbazaar.com [96.89.14.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B98012DA12 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 06:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.149] by mail.digitalbazaar.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>) id 1fIa75-0006HU-Vw; Tue, 15 May 2018 09:35:36 -0400
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Graham Klyne <gklyne@gmail.com>
References: <c7b3123a-f5db-d365-3bc7-31fd6d11eaa3@digitalbazaar.com> <cd5cb373-7bd8-e0c7-ba6d-a293562589f3@digitalbazaar.com> <CAKaEYhKtBx6TD-TuX3kxH4mWV_K1t_KM6FhKMxt5mngP5qTadg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
X-Opacus-Archived: none
Message-ID: <8315b563-3be2-649c-573e-8106d24abeb2@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 09:35:35 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKaEYhKtBx6TD-TuX3kxH4mWV_K1t_KM6FhKMxt5mngP5qTadg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.0.149
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.digitalbazaar.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/7w8QpYHOrXevwfIab8ZVjS0vlIk>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Fwd: Registration request: did URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:35:39 -0000

On 05/15/2018 04:41 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Distributed may be a more useful term in technical specifications,
> but decentralized tends to be more popular in the space this spec
> operates.

+1, good point, Melvin.

I don't know how to square that particular circle either. Please let us
know if you have a suggestion that would 1) resonate with folks not
deeply in tune with the nuances here, and 2) be more accurate than what
we have right now.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches
https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches