IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0CD3A0C8E for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:05:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nVTCJPyeVpq1 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0CE3A0E19 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus004 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N6tSF-1kEekv0YEJ-018L5e for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:05:06 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:05:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1546307172.10307.1605110705834@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <1888561123.43509.1590034134659@email.ionos.com>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com>, <ead89691-e0a4-e1dc-4d79-fbe65722731b@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, <122709156.27676.1590010716156@email.ionos.com> <5EC5F6A9.7599.23B3E5E7@dan.tobias.name> <1888561123.43509.1590034134659@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:8HgUjirGVkBIfkcvK/ji1JeoShTx0tDgQWDyXpz/5k8x+W9nwnf qSX1MrBelrF0PoMihBNprlIJdo3na8GY0Wgy9UhI2uwN5DSmTqIkbed7vDFIeCC0d6Q53Mv dgNR3KBJzNBYUqavNTEN3W1qbSoWSE2tK1u07FcLKzx6Hmg800WMuCXQqBI/7yyURMSHWO/ 6M+ibUvTupmM3Ct6udr0A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:VRInmrnkR74=:igALDJPf3CXEGnCtlUzYET W56hm99paJW8PG8jm+MgEtKQbx0GCSg4FL0kzf320TwbZsgCirTq57MNaFKXyMgaBZ73XOUMv D+55RXchOwR70ByzaRkCW76bic3VYaT3aR/0vbXTXndtsHVCmji6GpwapmxKHpmzn0u94IgTL ZUhckOzT3kaPL3Co7lTpSdjiOta5C4jyKhWLv0px2Zpq8q/BD3TE/UyVgYxoIUpzmql0taRKf dYHoxFXhfIH84KyOtmtnl2KMN732HPOqMz/KCmSu9dJ8Ip4D00YFED44TcOKMMAADPPSDTmLf rRuweY/noff7WmoSs3BF97q3ZLB33q95DyBkm5ocJAl7+o58f6V5qKZlDKaLp2Ixys/bpPW7t +gAVG8//xRJLTZWpQJ7SDjzp39qGBWFEFwP+8MQIiuYqZF5C5WhFoov4EXoS1XABrNW4yq2op UtwCVfAk0A==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/8DtoaMsmJnULHBNBjwXglMK8E7Y>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:05:45 -0000

text version:
hmm, it looks like my email client made it into a link.  I fixed it and it works perfectly!  Thank you Daniel.

> On 05/21/2020 12:08 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> hmm, it looks like my email client made it into a link. I fixed it and it works perfectly! Thank you Daniel.
> > On May 20, 2020 at 11:34 PM "Daniel R. Tobias" < dan@tobias.name> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 20 May 2020 at 17:38, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
> > 
> > > I followed your instructions and I could not recreate what you wanted
> > > me to see. Here are the two pages I made:
> > > < http://www.soupsdeli.com/base.html>
> > > < http://www.soupsdeli.com/drop>
> > > Perhaps it had something to do with the hosting provider?? I'm not
> > > sure what's wrong here.
> > This is the content of your first page:
> > 
> > <!doctype html>
> > <html>
> > <head><meta charset="us-ascii">
> > <title>test link</title>
> > 
> > </head>
> > <body>
> > <div> <h2><a href=' http://drop#fg34htx' target="_blank"
> > rel="noopener">Link to drop URI</a></div>
> > </body>
> > </html>
> > 
> > 
> > As you can see, the "href" value doesn't have "drop#fg34htx" by
> > itself as requested; it has a " http://" (http://) before it. This transforms it
> > into a http URI with "drop" as its domain, which my browser
> > "helpfully" converts into a link to drop.com. It would presumably
> > then go to the fragment #fg34htx in that page if such a fragment
> > existed.
> > 
> > --
> > == Dan ==
> > Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
> > Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
> > Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
> >

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email