[Uri-review] New version of JMS URI posted.

Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> Mon, 13 October 2008 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <uri-review-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-uri-review-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCCF3A69F6; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F693A680B for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RmOiLydZHxJ7 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.tibco.com (mx1.tibco.com [63.100.100.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D473A67A7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.tibco.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EC1F4C75E; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na-h-inhub2.tibco.com (unknown [10.106.132.33]) by mx1.tibco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418DB4C658; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na-pa-fe01.na.tibco.com (na-pa-fe01.tibco.com [10.106.136.111]) by na-h-inhub2.tibco.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m9DMZbs2007538; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.98.39.103] ([10.98.39.103]) by na-pa-fe01.na.tibco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:37 -0700
Message-ID: <48F3CD44.7040803@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:48 -0700
From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: uri-review@ietf.org, "SOAP/JMS (list)" <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2008 22:35:37.0774 (UTC) FILETIME=[03B29CE0:01C92D84]
Subject: [Uri-review] New version of JMS URI posted.
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri-04.txt

Changes to this draft are discussed here:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0046.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Oct/0018.html

Please advise with any feedback you might have.

Thanks!

-Eric.
_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review