IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uri-review] Re: draft-grimminck-safe-ioc-sharing

Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> Tue, 28 April 2026 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gk@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: uri-review@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF47E4C473A; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1777382200; bh=BMwSQ03Lu+2wl2k2u1T5+pEdH9nqQO3+xTnbg5SrA04=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=zGmnp0JI670JtobchWMYblADk6QaD+lUOiThAIFSU8mpD+ZXn9Iztubu5gxPZqlXS AavqrC6XoOkEaBvNZlYa6WdRr/iY2YjhoHZ/FXldVGvvLdXkI5ETXVrobFREhOsWzN wtEhS31HCXU8T/m9z4ZUxbb9S2SDhe5iD6cKWa0c=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ninebynine.org header.b="0VIZHzVg"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="jLSOJGCs"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l907n0aB-POK; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.156]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60938E4C3083; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683427A00DE; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:15:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:15:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ninebynine.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1777382100; x=1777468500; bh=+zqmzAV6jriPpAPs7Vr2O8FPnOGWAulV sD1zw+GxqPI=; b=0VIZHzVgtQKKGndceOWy61wWdvYz6jFbqVftPxQ7UDbosgKy dtnaej8+f1Pzn3m4dEt+B0XAR3a0L5wHZo1Ide0PIou+bDF3fyoDw6fiJYoK1pOU 0nbs/27gg9FXRDH1JqxNfx29oTM2iNTWKLPhyWWXKLBfS2I6NV0jL2jJTN8k2mTk LuzuHNqgIyAdjPnrJitRVHtBKmMGJ0ojPNpoNXS1XTtFNPSVX51OABmu7oq8lnOO bBWvpeBfaMBnxDc3nrbPm91EouDWlVttEFswARJFe1S8EKkvDmondwx+mhog8UU6 g5G8eHZR/adf51gbdX+kEbSkVyCMn0gxxm5RXw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1777382100; x= 1777468500; bh=+zqmzAV6jriPpAPs7Vr2O8FPnOGWAulVsD1zw+GxqPI=; b=j LSOJGCseBcInHgOburM+RWV0PeaVIVBMPOc392SOHyCxVtYERjBT9gAGV0kJL3BU VwiCm7qG56n2EL9RnvBXC1UPxKVI8qfdF1c3RiqVIMGxFffs9jyTTgv4X9Pu0m/c f10fjS88ZeHAbRZPoT9h7BKAA9WwybqVEUeuWASOodfmyAxTzGPJyRbQcv3mP9P5 qV/06hmpYYUM8CHc0i0nu98QM4ZC31hYp9zz/BVp7UgyfJHacIu0wT8stlQg/taa GAJkx6PnLbCcYlxXkmGX9tqSl8qkvgOLbIN6rJjvD9OZVFEWU7m/pv29btAZZaD5 X3aCAO4B2SllCnuAvkm+w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:07LwafMCl5txeYfrriUf1kHkM-1PxOVd4ApaCvYhrdnYXXYjy14aHg> <xme:07LwaS7t8mE5rAj9my0cImN_ashTHRhfwHfsBLx7oVUa8lUyJMoqtSQth07WJhAAL QskuGwuJOe9aGmObPmfHVVvOX2YbQ4cgoJETDl6-F1L5P0feO1vKQw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:07LwaZ2YJ9bkjTmqlHuEiS_Zag37xyeoINrI5io0Zwv2A_sqIzg7zhmAJ7OdadvoxTTo>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdekudeihecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptgfgggfuhfgjffevkfhfvffosehtqhhmtd hhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgrhhgrmhcumfhlhihnvgcuoehgkhesnhhinhgvsgihnhhi nhgvrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefgkeevudehfefgteelvddtffefjeevhe ehjeekueeuiefgteeihfetkeeuheduheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgkhesnhhinhgvsgihnhhinhgvrdhorhhgpdhnsggprh gtphhtthhopeeipdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegurhgrfhhtqdhg rhhimhhmihhntghkqdhsrghfvgdqihhotgdqshhhrghrihhnghesihgvthhfrdhorhhgpd hrtghpthhtohepthgvugdrihgvthhfsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepuhhr ihdqrhgvvhhivgifsehivghtfhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegtohhnthgrtghtsehsth gvfhgrnhhgrhhimhhmihhntghkrdhnlhdprhgtphhtthhopehgkhesnhhinhgvsgihnhhi nhgvrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhftgdqihhsvgesrhhftgdqvgguihhtohhrrdhorh hg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:07LwaTxKJpCKlTgHgoCs9Ls-7k7wz7Jfx5wtu9CWp-6XNFInLfSSuA> <xmx:07LwaTveEoeviQkVth4Z0ypjqBY0Drgf_KxQAJRuute3jNfaMq0BTw> <xmx:07LwadwQA2PJpeMy2br81bVUVbz_0kBztzoVwTG8fFqZ3R9yFapOyw> <xmx:07LwaeCkuaI8xJS8T0994RpbRTmvkpL-sEzmcnW6A84vjYbGZMV75A> <xmx:1LLwaUlNatI-j5OsDdfZl8I6kKp29ptL21XWUzpC2TdeaO2L6mcpB4Eu>
Feedback-ID: i3b414768:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:14:59 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
In-Reply-To: <85ec7098-3ffb-4173-ba04-bcea9e7edac1@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:14:45 +0100
Message-Id: <CB788129-2A5C-4028-B672-04F28BAED813@ninebynine.org>
References: <85ec7098-3ffb-4173-ba04-bcea9e7edac1@rfc-editor.org>
To: Independent Submissions Editor <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (22H340)
Message-ID-Hash: HUNDXJDJA3MZFNZVXQACT6MYRBK56XBK
X-Message-ID-Hash: HUNDXJDJA3MZFNZVXQACT6MYRBK56XBK
X-MailFrom: gk@ninebynine.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-uri-review.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Stefan Grimminck <contact@stefangrimminck.nl>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, uri-review@ietf.org, draft-grimminck-safe-ioc-sharing@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Uri-review] Re: draft-grimminck-safe-ioc-sharing
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/AULQP0L1lPfbU7exFLNUtCPuCxI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:uri-review-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:uri-review-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:uri-review-leave@ietf.org>

Sent from my iPhone

> On 28 Apr 2026, at 12:29, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> You may ask the IANA to reassign those two schemes to this draft.  At the least you should contact the original assignee.  If there is agreement, this should be a pretty easy thing.  You may also ask for a permanent allocation, but the process will get dragged out.

If you do this, I would suggest requesting “Historical” rather than “Permanent” allocation.  (Historical is still effectively permanent, but with a nuance of “not recommended for continued use”).  (I see no reason for this to drag out the process, given the review this has now had, but that’s no longer my call.)

#g

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status