Re: [Uri-review] URI Scheme "ves:"

Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com> Tue, 21 December 2021 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wade@soupsdeli.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38383A0DF5 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:11:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, XPRIO=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DU_kF6EnaRjh for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:11:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73B83A0DF4 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxusgaltgw00.schlund.de ([10.72.72.46]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQgmZ-1mtneh0AkX-00U3jq; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:11:38 +0100
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:11:37 -0500
From: Wade Benford <wade@soupsdeli.com>
To: Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <28205083.56495.1640099497609@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <69292463-950E-4379-81B0-CD4887B8E7C0@commercebyte.com>
References: <1174886867.22172.1640093277007@email.ionos.com> <F42C6667-6AF1-4382-941A-DE16D8C15428@commercebyte.com> <1693619625.16369.1640095542307@email.ionos.com> <213EECD8-8AD3-4723-9335-9B256146ABDC@commercebyte.com> <1523568480.20322.1640097911866@email.ionos.com> <69292463-950E-4379-81B0-CD4887B8E7C0@commercebyte.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev33
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1ZRFmPXwsIa4/YdFhl/pTNk4Hx6d3Esv/V4q2RQGmBf4fMkFwrd ojly9JfdztsR42YIktwQLgHD57GXjl6TIVKPHPc2n6RmQhnb77VNgGvKDGiVUhZLYL8HC4l nAdeinvdZQ6baJGOZl3gYbaqaqT2gJLKjnA4u3q+/4OBHINYuoxzVRZNkocUFfBfSGlsInW 7AMyEVhTnETP0NipcfGZA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qJgZZls9bVk=:03H2CD5vUB3zWVfjHPSxiA vVox4ZJSjP4IoXt985zRrmjdSqDqTJMqcPtmroMi1ma1lDHUQtcf6jmDNwxLkl2TtUhC+WC9n yCXNZJ+pOCc/uxi8dS2qRQ/YSEnpQyNAi4Dshz3+M9tX2MDZa96PM951bC64H4vxu38sJTcQg yy5wfhmTS+LX6FtWn/jEkmdMitMBfHnigNwfyre9XiwFmQG3lKp/+QlM9iyHoRkecOARtIF3w zg9aTrpkUghoZ69H8PGDouy8f02GTy9IiQP5ZRXk4gZrQkgArqxSDk58JE+dZBMZiaCoBSdMR RONzmyWP9K0N8p8hn0SJcfvp29kbMYm2XPNg4/9cb2LBvLgRy/8+bbRWiXMDF5bm3OP9J1ils zUF3ANYSv8i6ofAiMAk+R3bgpu2ceTJkAngDGTeB4I7DmTyup+FxfBwDjLsK6dCx8WLPHD9ab 8OSWKU5qX3YWT94FHOucvzjhN49OiMpsBb6OI8WrvE3LC+tUPEEjk4tDAzQubUY3w+Eo2EdxW 5BsKesB2Z0V7wcqwTITDb+oux/D9jMfGVtNNtvMK/hMCp3j9Qr3BRXt6IKKHspU91SvL3Bdy6 ASJq8hQ8YOBkj7veiTOGrcU6+/73qTgqbLZ2cD6zP7XnbEPnAF6VOnjBgDysWYuRgxGb/S0U0 7jxf5mjU2XMkAbyttA6OtgrEEcA9kWkH+piVCQqmGZb1Us1t0TI7ViQlD03B1joLnrnw=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/Aunz_5YeIRTH4vMAwWXoPVh8DkQ>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI Scheme "ves:"
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 15:11:45 -0000

> On 12/21/2021 10:04 AM Jim Zubov <ietf-list@commercebyte.com> wrote:
> I just wanted to explicitly state that the separator characters, when unescaped, should never be treated as a part of improperly encoded path.
> 

So you won't ever use "ves#" instead of "ves:" right?