Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Fri, 27 April 2012 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F4021F86E8; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrcO9wr1mSMV; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B0B21F86E4; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; l=1005; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1335538240; x=1336747840; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S0IMkFRaj6x4gCW7DbfiSuiuiY+VW0cwbRSxyLRyB6A=; b=a4e+GaBWlsn8gZ4lqbf6aRx4st7doODo/BDy4U785wDolWDwa5/teVAl x8hYESGRbGa2riH49evzv+wjTSErMYZQEOJr2gDpryuj6vpK7f21b9cSy DdF5hRMyQ7P7PQp4h4oNmBIJb6YVokvoLXz+EeinGenuhvf+EGg+gZV4V U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8FAJmxmk+rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABEoVeQE4EHggkBAQEECAoBFxAyCgMMAQMCCQ8CBAEBKAcZIwoJCAEBBBMLF4dqnEugMpFDBIhjhRaWW4Fpgwg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,491,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="39899881"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2012 14:50:39 +0000
Received: from dwingWS ([10.32.240.194]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3REodvi001640; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:50:39 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: "'Rick van Rein'" <rick@openfortress.nl>
References: <20120426092725.GC27002@newphantom.local> <0d9801cd240f$456579c0$d0306d40$@com> <20120427052933.GA31576@newphantom.local>
In-Reply-To: <20120427052933.GA31576@newphantom.local>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:50:39 -0700
Message-ID: <0ee101cd2485$1ca77800$55f66800$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac0kNY/qfUzLnZlFRXq/i/jariHSOwAT0h1A
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:50:40 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick van Rein [mailto:rick@openfortress.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:30 PM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: 'Rick van Rein'; uri-review@ietf.org; sipcore@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [sipcore] Proposal: sip6 URI scheme
> 
> Hello,
> 
> > > Your feedback is kindly welcomed.
> >
> > It's a layering violation, and -- worse -- will cause far more harm
> > than it could possibly help.  Please don't do this.
> 
> Thanks all for looking into this proposal.  It is clear that it will
> not
> gain wide acceptance, and should not be taken any further.
> 
> I'm withdrawing the proposal.

I do like the attention to IPv6, though -- don't get me wrong!  I
expect ICE is sufficient to find a working IPv6 or working IPv4
media path, and choosing between them.  If it is deficient, please
point it out, as ICE is being used by WEBRTC on the Internet (where
the IPv4/IPv6 address selection problem will be more severe than
within controlled networks).

-d