Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
Bob Van Zant <bob@eventbrite.com> Mon, 24 October 2011 05:32 UTC
Return-Path: <bob@eventbrite.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A3021F8801 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, URI_HEX=0.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NDue1jN61zFN for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD4D21F8678 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so8607531iab.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.147.196 with SMTP id o4mr39972210icv.33.1319434320945; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.180.195 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4EA4EDFB.3050406@gmail.com>
References: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA24B23.3010900@gmail.com> <4EA33D70.6080500@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EA4EDFB.3050406@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:32:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHcUcOF=z7v5cTN7gsvfX45QLw2jGNSdiQYgybUB6Aq=BjjkZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Van Zant <bob@eventbrite.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:32:02 -0000
In that discussion the working group appears to be agreeing that there's no reason to ask organizations to register structured names like com-eventbrite-attendee. It does not appear to suggest that organizations should not register their schemes. In any case I submitted our registration request to IANA before this occurred. On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> wrote: > 23.10.2011 1:02, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >> >> Hello Mykyta, >> >> On 2011/10/22 13:48, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: >>> >>> Bob, >>> >>> The IRI WG has reached the consensus to remove the statement you were >>> guided by in the 4395bis. >> >> Can you say which statement you are referring to? > > See http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/73; that's > >> Organizations that desire a private name space for URI scheme names >> are encouraged to use a prefix based on their domain name, expressed >> in reverse order. For example, a URI scheme name of com-example-info >> might be registered by the vendor that owns the example.com domain >> name. > > Mykyta > >> >> Regards, Martin. >> >>> It hasn't been the current practice, I and I >>> don't recommend you to proceed with the registration. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev >>> >>> 11.10.2011 2:30, Bob Van Zant wrote: >>>> >>>> It looks like most URI schemes like this one are never registered with >>>> IANA. It seems like The Right Thing to do and so I present to the list >>>> the URI scheme com-eventbrite-attendee. >>>> >>>> >>>> URI scheme name. >>>> com-eventbrite-attendee >>>> >>>> Status. >>>> provisional >>>> >>>> URI scheme syntax. >>>> uri = "com-eventbrite-attendee:" method [ "?" query ] >>>> method = "resetpassword" / "tickets" >>>> >>>> Example: >>>> >>>> >>>> com-eventbrite-attendee:resetpassword?email=user%40domain.com&token=DEADBEEF >>>> >>>> >>>> URI scheme semantics. >>>> This scheme is intended to be used by operating systems that have the >>>> Eventbrite Attendee application installed. When a URI with >>>> this scheme is encountered it is expected that the operating system >>>> launches the Eventbrite Attendee application with the method and >>>> query parameters specified in the URI. >>>> >>>> The exact semantics for how URL information is communicated to the >>>> Eventbrite Attendee app may vary on an operating system basis. The >>>> expectation is simply that the operating system follows its own >>>> conventions for passing the method and query parameters into the >>>> application. >>>> >>>> Encoding considerations. >>>> The scheme and method portions of this proposed URI avoid encoding >>>> issues by limiting itself to a subset of ASCII. >>>> >>>> The query portion of a com-eventbrite-attendee URI shall be encoded >>>> according to the rules in RFC 3986. >>>> >>>> Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name. >>>> >>>> - Eventbrite Attendee for iOS >>>> - Eventbrite Attendee for Android >>>> >>>> Interoperability considerations. >>>> none. >>>> >>>> Security considerations. >>>> Against recommendations in RFC 3986 section 7.5 a >>>> com-eventbrite-attendee: URI may be used to transmit sensitive >>>> information. For example, it may be used to communicate a password >>>> reset token in email for a user following a "Forgot your password" >>>> flow. Though this token may have transmitted over insecure channels >>>> on its way to the application care must still be taken by >>>> application developers to not divulge this secret. >>>> >>>> RFC 3986 sections 7.2 and 7.5 apply >>>> >>>> Contact. >>>> Bob Van Zant >>>> Eventbrite >>>> 651 Brannan St >>>> San Francisco, CA 94103 >>>> USA >>>> >>>> EMail: bob@eventbrite.com >>>> >>>> Author/Change controller. >>>> Bob Van Zant >>>> >>>> References. >>>> >>>> Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform >>>> Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, >>>> January 2005. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Uri-review mailing list >>>> Uri-review@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Uri-review mailing list >>> Uri-review@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >
- [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mark Baker
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst