Re: [Uri-review] [rfc-i] Review:: draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme

Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> Mon, 07 April 2008 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <uri-review-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-uri-review-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060023A6BCA; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD133A6AA1 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WGjDwSob+pLt for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.songbird.com (mail.songbird.com [208.184.79.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFC43A6A96 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.songbird.com [208.184.79.10]) by mail.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m379FsLO001687; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:15:55 -0700
Message-ID: <47F9E3DC.7030601@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:05:32 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
References: <ftatv1$urq$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <ftatv1$urq$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Clean
X-Songbird-From: gk@ninebynine.org
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [rfc-i] Review:: draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Hi, some issues in draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme:
> 
>  3) Redefining the STD 66 <authority> is confusing.  What
>     is apparently wanted here is a complete URI replacing
>     slashes by commas everywhere.

Not only confusing, but contravening the requirements for registering a new URI 
scheme.  See: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4395.txt sections 2.8, 3.

The examples in section 3.2 of 
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme-03.txt are not allowable 
according to the syntax defined in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt (only 
digits may follow a ':').

#g

-- 
Graham Klyne
Contact info: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review