IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

"Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org> Mon, 22 May 2006 20:13 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiGm3-00033m-JF; Mon, 22 May 2006 16:13:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiGm3-00033h-BW for uri-review@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 16:13:07 -0400
Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiGm2-0002SE-5U for uri-review@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 16:13:07 -0400
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f28so1564525pyf for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 May 2006 13:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=bvz22IJli5HyTez9GiTrBRtqCJPfcCiSffCQkT98tnyv8QKM6XQmIq1vUJ5bKI25y0KSnHdCmDwmTv4wb14jUbdWcW9lx7kEbP41/a994bNKt0Le0IbwRu+pXLH2jyaroxOni8AiaV/OGIGpqCRVYiMZUf3hMIrPM5pikA9+EII=
Received: by 10.35.93.18 with SMTP id v18mr151228pyl; Mon, 22 May 2006 13:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.70.20 with HTTP; Mon, 22 May 2006 13:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0605221313o5eb4a19chc35dadfe7b4a415b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:13:05 +0200
From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
To: Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
In-Reply-To: <1D4A05136773CF4DB373F6FE4E103150110EEAEE@df-pug-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c70bc85d0605201234l59d17edfud97c1776fa550f63@mail.gmail.com> <1D4A05136773CF4DB373F6FE4E103150110EEAEE@df-pug-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 27e3ed9368c8ab6f
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, Jerry Dunietz <jerryd@windows.microsoft.com>, Gregg Brown <greggb@microsoft.com>, "John Calhoon (LCA)" <john.calhoon@microsoft.com>
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org

Andrey,

On 5/20/06, Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> you ask why do we need to refer to a part using /bar.xml?
>
> We don't need to use exactly this form of relative reference to refer to a
> part. Our goal was to guarantee that any relative reference in a package
> part refers to a part within the same package

Ok, thanks.  What purpose does this goal serve?

Mark.

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email