Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme registration request - dchub

Fredrik Ullner <ullner@gmail.com> Mon, 03 June 2013 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ullner@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E6C21E80B3; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAX4L8hGizOg; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AD421E80A5; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b11so11783943iee.11 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lUH6L0u2bM/hlkGr9M6ix7jg5uTnM7wgsNtEte0SFvg=; b=gBYInMsjkwiTjRyQkssflIoZ1HmShLdHDRy03QydoOGFGU9CzESwg/IoBDJkhhTz2G 8Veqcn7JbLYZ83TZHAEwkJzK9TkZVt40DmZoWS3ADwcLtbH42Mf3hCO8GdyU54IEYCWk v09kjCS7reUZxq/kgGVaO/fOTS9BrksbdhcuVIdNlsHwUb6lTPidMjsRiHhPNx26yNDB MDT8iTMkm9hO8bO+yqxhhERDLYlSF/auvMNjBGnSc2z2to9eaVKD1VyeIr2cQ+tZejgl OVGyn/47j6Ap7unHBKfmM7UaSveCmLYxbeur9AdjwPvDRkIgA+9IX8uyYQQUaVZqb0QN UJMA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.153.47 with SMTP id vd15mr9111621igb.92.1370287389313; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.171.2 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <513E26F5.9080207@tibco.com>
References: <CAOd=0fOPCgEwPWxOm3QDn=QKe8Rb8RmShn5sEL3iBS_z6aOUXg@mail.gmail.com> <512663B2.20809@tibco.com> <CAOd=0fPuFsoTCh0mcYt_vVi-=Y5Or4oNQT+BYpKZv1zop0vdHA@mail.gmail.com> <51278B10.10200@ninebynine.org> <CAOd=0fMyEVHgQnzZpoH3wXws+T30V5O82u13nFwA+A=4FwQbnQ@mail.gmail.com> <513CAD82.409@ninebynine.org> <513E26F5.9080207@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 21:23:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOd=0fNA3OFG0_AH1ga8auUUrs7PbxGq1srGxZiox1NWGwO8eg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fredrik Ullner <ullner@gmail.com>
To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149532c1494cd04de44e5a0
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI scheme registration request - dchub
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:30:00 -0000

Hi,

There is now a new version of the dchub URI scheme proposal at <
http://nmdc.sourceforge.net/Versions/nmdc-uri-scheme-0.3.txt>;. There are a
couple of changes:

* It was decided to drop the secure dchub URI (nmdcs) inclusion. While this
is an URI that is used, it was felt that it is better to have that as a
separate URI scheme proposal. (The reason for the naming was simply that
the person who wrote it in the first place, wrote it as such.)
* Scheme syntax is very slightly changed to allow a forward slash after
user (as it is allowed elsewhere, too).
* Semantics is heavily revised, taking into account suggested changes from
you as well as from multiple developers of the Direct Connect network (i.e.
implementators).
* Encoding slightly revised, primarily for normalization. A question came
up: should the 'normalization' be changed to 'canonicalization'?
* Applications/protocol slightly revised, specifying more implementations.
Perhaps it is otherwise better to create a reference on a NMDC project page
and reference that in the URI scheme? Or perhaps reference Wikipedia?
* Minor wording in other sections to clarify use or intent.

The document, as is, is also commited to the SourceForge SVN. Note that
SourceForge decided to change repositories, so you would need to do a diff
on your own if you desire to see the exact changes.


-- 
Fredrik Ullner