IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> Tue, 16 June 2020 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0353A15E6 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_mko4eNh5kp for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seine.is.ed.ac.uk (seine.is.ed.ac.uk [129.215.17.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D41813A15F7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crunchie.inf.ed.ac.uk (crunchie.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.202.41]) by seine.is.ed.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05GEJh32001598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:19:43 +0100
Received: from ecclerig.inf.ed.ac.uk (ecclerig.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.24.151]) by crunchie.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05GEJful003912; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:19:41 +0100
Received: from ecclerig.inf.ed.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ecclerig.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05GEJgcs005805; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:19:42 +0100
Received: (from ht@localhost) by ecclerig.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 05GEJdZg005804; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:19:39 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: ecclerig.inf.ed.ac.uk: ht set sender to ht@inf.ed.ac.uk using -f
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, uri-review@ietf.org
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com> <1783049000.100771.1590323508943@email.ionos.com> <5ECA8A94.23977.101292FE@dan.tobias.name> <1426881880.158099.1590335585858@email.ionos.com> <94368b41-c15b-da2c-421d-fdd9300be6e9@dret.net> <1310141163.159340.1590344745080@email.ionos.com> <BL0PR2101MB102738EF50D7C8AD647E10BBA3B20@BL0PR2101MB1027.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <1081815563.141711.1590624311343@email.ionos.com> <BL0PR2101MB102762C4CAFACC383412D5D8A38E0@BL0PR2101MB1027.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <BL0PR2101MB10278A5360398EFF2E73FC0BA38E0@BL0PR2101MB1027.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <117630321.142251.1590627970509@email.ionos.com> <8ae1641a-74c8-6c2d-7092-6cf53e745fb7@ninebynine.org> <797476254.282655.1590770737009@email.ionos.com> <CA+9kkMDUiFHLYqx-nTchvSkQE0VUEGkvXni0cuYHvPYr8YoLHA@mail.gmail.com> <1729337515.289325.1590778487527@email.ionos.com> <4CEF6E3B-6116-4CDB-B660-16554A9638B5@mac.com> <1192631250.937545.1592251697716@email.ionos.com> <8783b642-c4bd-ce63-9113-c13c340abad1@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <423303294.393105.1592315876635@email.ionos.com>
From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:19:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <423303294.393105.1592315876635@email.ionos.com> (Timothy Mcsweeney's message of "Tue\, 16 Jun 2020 09\:57\:56 -0400 \(EDT\)")
Message-ID: <f5btuzbum84.fsf@ecclerig.inf.ed.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1012 (Gnus v5.10.12) XEmacs/21.5-b34 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Edinburgh-Scanned: at seine.is.ed.ac.uk with MIMEDefang 2.84, Sophie, Sophos Anti-Virus, Clam AntiVirus
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 129.215.17.202
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/LSADwEGyxhcHQ1ut6yEoC5PKAlo>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:19:55 -0000

Timothy Mcsweeney writes:

>    Does anyone disagree with Martin?

I agree that no-one will use your non-scheme.  If you meant by your
question to suggest that you should be allowed to register it as an
experiment, then I don't agree with that at all.

You cannot register a URI scheme that does not conform to the RFCs which
govern URIs.  Many people have explained to you that your proposal does
not conform, and given helpful advice on what changes you need to make
to make a conformant proposal.

End of story.

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email