IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Sun, 24 May 2020 03:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CF63A107B for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2020 20:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6W5eROxLmr1N for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 May 2020 20:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB003A1020 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 May 2020 20:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw00.schlund.de ([10.72.72.46]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2bMR-1imWH426FR-00sLed for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 05:37:43 +0200
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 23:37:42 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <811217250.273727.1590291463007@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <5EC9B257.31362.CC5E003@dan.tobias.name>
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com>, <5EC5F6A9.7599.23B3E5E7@dan.tobias.name>, <624184630.116213.1590182968873@email.ionos.com> <5EC9B257.31362.CC5E003@dan.tobias.name>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev31
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1h4+KrDfzoUZOzsV+Ekoy/SiOmaDQUHvQezB0hb/sXCB58sYyAA vDbQopgPU48F5OPXrBIAqmI3Tfl43M4CgYq8LKR719YAod5Xottwf5HRmBM7nKlGJerLBmP CXc256Elg9poYsj8xHtfHd+e2ms9Pla12r2TSRNqynYVPV8xHxBZXrKlk4AedMA75H4j5y5 bKgarpgtH16q8Ytcds5ew==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:JDfrFKDe9jI=:r08o96P410FOOQvA7nw/o9 gEMHsUycX9Z9UiPSLxhgdOaNSKauGLQRnAeCQvLmulhw59f7oBU+D9YVTGtTO4AJWqe4a5sMf aoSD9TVdC3J8oXGlLASE5TUq0hvCm09TGNXTNIJd8+zxKVg3so59c56GMmJ2egHDXRwCdu25H +qKrs5QRHVyyPDY7oEf5bGRpSK4btBgvPA+A3Hb2ZjMe9J3B09RJzs7slmePc5vZFakSekesj NkwwXxTGj362jyrCTgfUuT8X1WHxPuBYN/hQLR+2yd34o0Xbv9iMBMw/Hm704Rj7QrPdny4iM +iAjwuM7i3NneZZEmIpjyv1xajied9X8bOBO0WaPQfNPO7fgodT9kV2uJSpZHHOco5zytfXvL mJjXNcAbr5ftMPjpOEedeHFBsnhr16l4OlowNN8wqbb2uc77zRWO5WbwUZAuXHj1ml1WVuTUr Xe96NbeVeqmoLL+6yzOt85jsJATgIMeBRXEPwgNXc0t4J2vXXT9bK1LTqD1jwKFH+H4VGkro1 lkvUGvWI+t5zaBJM7VTuCSS8axik0T7o/HrW8zcrFxbkh7qU4GsINkiQ4ys24wekAmuacDd+7 JbCV0PmgUf8v7cmXuF798FNIVP60Le3+JJLkJ8vGP2rhOpVKfcyVWV5uR+ge8rGnggHeJjEQR enZV/FXsqwMVgG3R7fuEu06sLj/TccJS6J5kBilumoYRlqctr3kcN4xvauF1wIZYneFEnGp6L 4d4v91Q+fIbBhmfUOLMRcoFEs7w/fhdZRwUWeBQUq823R9vQQz1hYIzgsM6iJ+yPQr6T4Tq5x WEz4Cdbl14e/upjZaBNqVjhOzmnBQmV+ZUy/BWT5L99CBRmsPmoRqjvwZGJUb2S7t3roQwz
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/LhJTACCmlaDn-I2K-g5KoTCS3wE>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 03:37:46 -0000

Hi Daniel, 

I think I know what you're saying but I want to make sure so, when you say 'mandatory colon' do you mean for all URIs or for just http?

Tim
On May 23, 2020 at 7:31 PM "Daniel R. Tobias" < dan@tobias.name> wrote:


On 22 May 2020 at 17:29, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:

The second draft of the 'drop' URI scheme is available and can be
found here < 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/" rel="nofollow">" rel="noopener" target="_blank" data-mce-href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/>">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcsweeney-drop-scheme/>.  Thank
you. 
This doesn't seem to resolve any of the issues people have raised; it
still omits the mandatory colon after the scheme, and puts its main
content, used for resource resolution and retrieval, in a fragment
identifier, which is intended for client-specific post-processing
after a document is retrieved.

--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/" rel="noopener nofollow" target="_blank">http://domains.dan.info/


_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email