[Uri-review] Review request: ggz URI scheme
Josef Spillner <josef@ggzgamingzone.org> Sun, 28 December 2008 09:29 UTC
Return-Path: <uri-review-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-uri-review-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3B728C161; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:29:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD4728C161 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:29:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdHG5f8yVnkE for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:29:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpout.hostsharing.net (smtpout.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.99]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F29028C12D for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:29:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h02.hostsharing.net (h02.hostsharing.net [212.21.77.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpout.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C4A2000098 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:29:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (dslb-088-073-196-166.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.196.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h02.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6251CF07831 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:29:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Josef Spillner <josef@ggzgamingzone.org>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:28:47 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_Qb0VJJr1YQtEuou"
Message-Id: <200812281028.48125.josef@ggzgamingzone.org>
Subject: [Uri-review] Review request: ggz URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org
Hello, a first draft on URIs/IRIs for use with GGZ Gaming Zone clients is attached. I would like to have it reviewed. One particular uncertainty from my side is how to handle URI and IRI differences, built into the grammar or added as an afterthought like done in the draft. Josef
_______________________________________________ Uri-review mailing list Uri-review@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
- [Uri-review] Review request: ggz URI scheme Josef Spillner
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request: ggz URI scheme Ted Hardie
- Re: [Uri-review] Review request: ggz URI scheme Mark Baker