Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Thu, 06 June 2013 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA8021F8956 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 00:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vdRARqIB4iSB for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 00:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D28421F85EB for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 00:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.17]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LdJxn-1U2s480Wfp-00iS9q for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:11:37 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Jun 2013 07:11:36 -0000
Received: from p5B2318C1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO netb.Speedport_W_700V) [91.35.24.193] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 06 Jun 2013 09:11:36 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/nGXw3J9LnQQuIluhSAElLT+ITvP3aSlkjRusRq+ 9FkeuWrwvu+0rs
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Kang Su Gatlin <kagatlin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:11:38 +0200
Message-ID: <93d0r89ep0k6p9kmpo5v77v4lqmjj2evq4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <45bdda3798ba439aa8d672381402755e@CH1PR03MB610.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <45bdda3798ba439aa8d672381402755e@CH1PR03MB610.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 07:11:42 -0000

* Kang Su Gatlin wrote:
>Hello, I am requesting review for the following URI scheme:
>
>   Resource Identifier (RI) Scheme name:
>      ms-settings-power
>   Status:
>      provisional
>   Scheme syntax:
>      ms-settings-power

It is not really possible to craft a `ms-settings-power` URI based on
this information, not other than `ms-settings-power:` at least.

>   Security considerations:
>      None

"None" does not make clear whether there genuinely are no issues to
consider or if simply no thought has been spent on the matter.

>   References:
>      http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/how-to/wp8/basics/battery-making-it-last

A requirement for provisional registration is "If no permanent, citable
specification for the URI scheme definition is included, credible
reasons for not providing it should be given." The document above does
not seem to even mention the scheme.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/