IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 23 February 2022 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090F43A1132 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:21:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZD-BQxyfYwwn for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4517A3A112D for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4K3h9W0M0GzDD7d; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:21:03 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <OF9EA0B359.6CAFEE0E-ON002587F0.006B73B3-002587F0.006BDE9B@pnp-hcl.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:21:02 +0100
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Scott Vrusho <scott_vrusho@pnp-hcl.com>, Robert S Sielken <rsielken@pnp-hcl.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 667326062.614861-eb99617dc4374fc4eddb898d93894367
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CE37A3D3-A96E-4A5C-AF77-47D503E2720C@tzi.org>
References: <OF9EA0B359.6CAFEE0E-ON002587F0.006B73B3-002587F0.006BDE9B@pnp-hcl.com>
To: Doug Conmy <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/Pa06uAoyetYtM6wBITWem4loXk8>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Requesting review of 'notes' URI scheme per RFC7595 for permanent status
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:21:11 -0000

On 2022-02-21, at 20:38, Doug Conmy <dconmy@pnp-hcl.com> wrote:
> 
> The scheme is currently provisional:   https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/notes

What is IBM Lotus Notes?  Do you have a reference for that?
I can’t find anything that would indicate this exists any more.

> As I understand it, XML is the preferred format and has been included.

I can’t parse this — where is that XML?

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email