IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 13 May 2011 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C44E067A for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.350, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2RmoG-5kYMSQ for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB87DE0670 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so1198252gyf.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qnf1hNfKw18AwXJmvXMRzRCucgdFK8hEqGu2oXJjJn0=; b=WpoP12XoVkHxdy3OmENZ55eC2uqB6V+85M+9Eyhd6+A8/dDFoPYi60Uqhxr118xRxe UkbLhwB+byy54L/4Kn89i/dYg+YwmCFNNjq7jQRjB0QlVj6bbh8CWDfbpwy2bxl2Vv9M 88xc1BBbdVuc3ldluq+q1eHHMpuo6dxFhY9us=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HjCgTl+BWz9yeuqDrdFT3CxxZgucOHIar+QWDz1QDwR9BWUm/Ev0GEUudrECsBGUF4 0XXKAx0WhLZdd9GB0ohAo1zzMJOyquY/CPj3W3NH5xyCWr7jZVhl/3tSoPbQlOjeHqPx 6+rbtf4jiNA/PwE7iwk3VWK26mqWewiDRI/3k=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.192.161 with SMTP id i21mr1701011yhn.280.1305307230899; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.236.108.49 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DBD33C4.2090704@ninebynine.org>
References: <BANLkTim8eWcWwKfyERghK2tuSP1rK0SdsA@mail.gmail.com> <4DB1D685.4090706@ninebynine.org> <4DB5D6EE.4080503@isode.com> <4DB6B9B6.8040306@ninebynine.org> <BANLkTinMm0OyBqUNTU_-Er_4w1TK7kW-Eg@mail.gmail.com> <4DB6D2C8.4090806@ninebynine.org> <BANLkTimBP3zHOEn4F_S8-LhqK6+9AkXm6Q@mail.gmail.com> <0E82FA0E66DC3ABE22989712@17.101.34.182> <4DB70FFC.2000508@ninebynine.org> <BANLkTim9cLa2=y1EthczaVPGnHOx5h581Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DBD33C4.2090704@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 13:20:30 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: h1x2IBSKKzvEXzNnImC8CqfM6bM
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=9uzipksuTp6wszUk+YP3c=bZK9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, draft-ietf-sieve-external-lists.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review of "ab:" URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:20:32 -0000

Graham said...
> Some alternative suggestions I have that might meet the immediate
> requirements of Sieve include:
> - Use the existing URN namespace for IETF parameters (e.g.
> urn:ietf:param:sieve:addrbook:default).  I mentioned this previously, and
> recognize the concern mentioned by Alexey that this could be awkward for
> hand-written Sieve code, but feel that it is otherwise a technically
> reasonable approach.

We have taken this approach, along with using a shorthand indicator to
eliminate the need for the "urn:ietf:params:sieve" part when using
these URNs.  So we're withdrawing the request to register the
"addrbook" URI scheme.  Thanks, everyone, for taking the time to do
thoughtful and useful reviews.  Your comments improved the document,
even though we aren't ultimately using this URI scheme.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email