Re: [Uri-review] AD sponsorship
Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 11 November 2020 17:39 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC2A3A2739 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:39:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 284lJf5Y35pZ for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:39:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52653A2733 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxuslxaltgw03.schlund.de ([10.72.76.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus004 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MNtKu-1kwk6o2hqa-00OJGv; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:27:50 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:27:49 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
Message-ID: <770670659.14196.1605115669303@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <1405032752.10758.1602779803501@email.ionos.com>
References: <1274574756.248916.1602686518898@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJLLpJwcxNfrGG5uCKWKgr1xbLk4_Y8kxG6f--09KRwW+Q@mail.gmail.com> <1411985880.134425.1602705672052@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJ+kLo5p4TNknmEi_nPj8OLAee22QkwYjJQqnUXSKBR1DA@mail.gmail.com> <1405032752.10758.1602779803501@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev26
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:6vNE48km6kMFtZer0JabLtekQ6ofsoywt7RyzetFNhn3YxD+2tQ vjh2kNkm6khzlsf9wDlaMvfOssgNImhI5d5ju1ak2h4lNIClbi8smOpf8Oork5oUtJdZyuQ Y3nPz8qr8UO7FF/ee3luZ4lr76v+gwVnb6vWg+omvfbXUbWsrJePPxDqAlr29USooIFN5ds eN9ihZIU9HT1iUB3FxK9A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:SohKtWyV00o=:tBb0DB4QWv49VPMi1BAs7F 7wfyyLK3bDRoKplfEWL1H7nKasKM3/3ulC85K4m8uxK07vkc8j4dMmlT2y/7PnQ7LZIYmpRpk zbgvKBdht9MJKZWZN8M6BntEhloxiZ1H7eT5KBO7nIB/D0gLW3RUhvF9EZV+C1HP+T0yvsBe1 jjZN/XIuCEEbJLklbziKoIscITH/R2RqV+32oNj3KQk0ReoikljpZXMEgMrNpq7SFfFvD6LF0 rHKcstcvEk9KZd8h0b3znWzCjANJcixeAVXnULjyGCGtypyyIRGBgE1Ss7XYfmFplmZ18gXYp 6qvtgeaWqWs1Tm0R1nKdFXGLuTX1IryrK7gbHEPZK5/AKK3A68NgVGYSeqTPT0wHvCkl77zsn sMnMSgNWprmqzD9jq6HTsOjUtD2EBpMbZu1uCXBjDEMH5z2AzAbbKOXP6+bFI0iJ9lc1uQ49Q UMFi8XEBOg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/QjJ1yhmwUHJwvQ3RUYL0C1eGOGw>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] AD sponsorship
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:39:38 -0000
> On 10/15/2020 12:36 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote: > > > Barry, > > >Sometimes are specs are not clear on some points; we know that. This > >isn't one of those cases: the syntax of a URI is very clearly > >specified. > > Why don't you do a tiny update for RFC3986 like Ted did for RFC3405 and make it abundantly clear that only the colon can be used for any URI? Or better yet, I will and you can sponsor it. That be ok with you? > > Tim > > I cc'd the people that I think would be agreeable to the idea to get some early traction.
- Re: [Uri-review] AD sponsorship Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] AD sponsorship Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [Uri-review] AD sponsorship Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Uri-review] AD sponsorship Timothy Mcsweeney