Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme

"Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name> Thu, 06 June 2013 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dan@tobias.name>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E4E21F85C3 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFOc81AP4bh4 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a83.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE9421F8AF4 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a83.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a83.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE3A5E06A for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (c-66-176-79-182.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [66.176.79.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mail@dan.tobias.name) by homiemail-a83.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E4285E060 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:37:13 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <51B09089.31981.236CC8D@dan.tobias.name>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <45bdda3798ba439aa8d672381402755e@CH1PR03MB610.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <45bdda3798ba439aa8d672381402755e@CH1PR03MB610.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.63)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-description: Mail message body
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Review Request of new URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:37:25 -0000

On 5 Jun 2013 at 23:10, Kang Su Gatlin wrote:

>    Scheme semantics:
>       Launches the battery saver settings application.

Is this something for which there really, truly, is a need for a 
separate URI scheme to accomplish, rather than a more general 
"launch-system-settings" scheme which could have parameters for 
starting up various setup functions for a system?


-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/