IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> Sun, 24 May 2020 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <erik.wilde@dret.net>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B693A0AF9 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gsix22agFZyi for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postoffice.gristmillmedia.com (dret.net [209.188.86.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D423A0AF7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 123.234.197.178.dynamic.wless.lssmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch ([178.197.234.123]:12279 helo=[172.20.10.7]) by postoffice.gristmillmedia.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <erik.wilde@dret.net>) id 1jct4f-0006CF-V7; Sun, 24 May 2020 12:02:06 -0400
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>, uri-review@ietf.org
References: <491516506.246380.1589851279474@email.ionos.com> <5EC9B257.31362.CC5E003@dan.tobias.name> <1783049000.100771.1590323508943@email.ionos.com> <5ECA8A94.23977.101292FE@dan.tobias.name> <1426881880.158099.1590335585858@email.ionos.com>
From: Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>
Message-ID: <94368b41-c15b-da2c-421d-fdd9300be6e9@dret.net>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 18:02:03 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1426881880.158099.1590335585858@email.ionos.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - postoffice.gristmillmedia.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dret.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: authenticated_id: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: postoffice.gristmillmedia.com: birdhouse@dret.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/RKv5DFfCc2Yx4K4gI43LMSc0zvA>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 16:02:11 -0000

hey tim.

On 2020-05-24 17:53, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
> Yes, I agree and understand that the same way as you.   But when the "#" 
> leaves the client it is not leaving as a fragment,

what people are telling you is that "#" and anything following it never 
leaves the client, by definition.

> it is leaving as a 
> way to separate the URI components, <scheme> and <path> or for http it 
> would be separating <scheme> and <authority>.  It is this that makes me 
> believe that even if the colon is required for http resolution, it is 
> not necessarily required for all URI.

this discussion could be more productive if you had a brief look at the 
specs you're depending on. the very first rule shown in 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3 is

URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

each URI is defined like this and must have a colon.

cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net |
            | http://dret.net/netdret    |
            | http://twitter.com/dret    |

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email